Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit linkages for ODCID/OCID TP (#3149)

Martin Thomson <> Tue, 29 October 2019 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA601120137 for <>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pWOMyWogQBHb for <>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC39D120119 for <>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:16:52 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1572391012; bh=IuJnkhG3C6I9U0Nu/JPUFkLCpFMl+QL+gF+e1jv5Pd4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DXZf2cyFaXh3S0BWKjJOkt/kZxQ61tXYvS5+TN7Ab7tTuMWK5wGMLCpPh8oQqFsYg CDXIfwRyrUydrL7UQ5pYcWkjnz5Mhy7Ry3L/TBFZCtVDP6aR30KTJs5F41jZSqX8rP r0dcfDfBzvVDOkeP0Jypy7j8amd6v7lohXX5wD54=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3149/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Explicit linkages for ODCID/OCID TP (#3149)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db8c864e45ed_70eb3fc82a4cd95c736da"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 23:16:56 -0000

martinthomson approved this pull request.

> @@ -4412,9 +4412,10 @@ The following transport parameters are defined:
 original_connection_id (0x0000):
 : The value of the Destination Connection ID field from the first Initial packet
-  sent by the client.  This transport parameter is only sent by a server.  A
-  server MUST include the original_connection_id transport parameter if it sent
-  a Retry packet.
+  sent by the client.  This transport parameter is only sent by a server.  This
+  is the same value sent in the "Original Destination Connection ID" field of a
+  Retry packet (see {{packet-retry}}).  A server MUST include the

I might have misremembered, sorry.  In #3120, the text I was concerned about was

> If the server sends a Retry packet, it MUST include the Destination Connection ID field from the client's first Initial packet in the transport parameter.

But you didn't touch that. 

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: