IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Prioritization edits (#2322)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Fri, 11 January 2019 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AEA124BE5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:24:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zizymdy1peEy for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:24:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99ED1228B7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:24:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 07:24:44 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1547220284; bh=V6MzUKduF2ik5dmJ5D8M6BRrCGvWXEw/hvZg03A7J7E=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=FLqde4h0tx3xfIE7N/VpAkwKpW84VzDfHXV5eriIXsvEkrND+s4XXBHf1dLWzRB6f PWmzdWRRrbA4g86SHpCtEkx7yoKoU2VnSyyCFEmMjbpTHoib28wfLI2CRMqUGmn9YW iDucUFCYJ5CHAJzoPrUmS1IMnvkUMdSPi44CUBkA=
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab647a3c2213dd51dafa958e4c6131ac58c7ac96d992cf000000011850773c92a169ce17afe293@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2322/review/191709236@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2322@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2322@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Prioritization edits (#2322)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c38b53cb34f8_7e4e3fe066cd45c0920c6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_JHP8ow9WoA-ryzcJjsmmI6_vPY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:24:48 -0000

LPardue commented on this pull request.



>  
 Due to reordering between streams, an element can also be prioritized which is
 not yet in the tree. Such elements are added to the tree with the requested
 priority.
 
+
+In all cases, elements are assigned an initial weight of 16 unless a PRIORITY
+frame begins the stream.
+
+When a client request is first sent, its parent and weight are determined by the
+PRIORITY frame (see {{frame-priority}}) which begins the stream, if present.
+Otherwise, the element is dependent on the root of the priority tree. A request 
+stream dependent upon another request stream expresses the preference that the
+latter stream (the "parent" request) be allocated resources before the former
+stream (the "dependent" request).

The inspiration was to remove the text altogether because I don't think it helped. If I'm wrong, please let me know.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2322#discussion_r247152608

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email