IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update initial congestion window on MTU decrease (#3998)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 19 August 2020 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10023A0D20 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uP8xItcSZ4sU for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FD103A0D25 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-39b4a70.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-39b4a70.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.66]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90C4340E2C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1597855744; bh=DDU4aK2w4GYbREpVA76IFyngil7rf0i8KZWD5dVg2cQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=eguK0BGCUxZ3EUn7J6xoFxluKweJ/T4uTp7CItSWoV9WWh9VFBoDlqqmsA3jN0jgO qY/0V8QNKXFa8kpuk2Y9A43156wZhTDaWQ0hG4Tu6CM2LvwkySO69LPV+c5N1AbMgB OVMp3G/EtmGCRrD/Wx8Y1x8Argy8jeO4mqbatwHQ=
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:49:04 -0700
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5FGA2L7SFWTVF544F5JE4QBEVBNHHCQ5DTSU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3998/review/470652661@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3998@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3998@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Update initial congestion window on MTU decrease (#3998)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3d580099504_20ec19641530"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/aKjb1vjIl4tduzeKAtzrfkwT2ss>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 16:49:07 -0000

@ianswett commented on this pull request.



> +If the maximum datagram size is decreased in order to complete the handshake,
+the initial congestion window SHOULD be recalculated with the new smaller size.
+This avoids overly large initial congestion windows.  The initial window is
+not recalculated at any other time.

@gorryfair I updated the PR to be more general and the first sentence now says
"If the maximum datagram size changes during the connection, the initial
congestion window SHOULD be recalculated with the new size."

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3998#discussion_r473176383

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email