Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)

Christian Huitema <> Thu, 13 February 2020 04:48 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C5912008C for <>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 20:48:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aAlJTgW8UFAq for <>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 20:48:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AE7A12008A for <>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 20:48:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD546A0459 for <>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 20:48:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1581569307; bh=0EhpNWPCKo54q9AkluVOms37RnSskYdfHkLQ99jyfHk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=v1wxLqFQA/WpDbAD7IDiZpT8MUarFv0FPAnx2fPo0bWNQoAiZnrMImdyC7/c001K5 UcoxtdNip7FeobhwZ660Ar/307uGuXGh2dojysT86PEx5XHNMcA97YuoRKywf4pTX3 07tiatUTwAETet+m4PxvXHI6ZGNd1J7HKpp+Bvkk=
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 20:48:27 -0800
From: Christian Huitema <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3453/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ACK-only packets are not congestion controlled (#3453)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e44d51b6b293_55ef3fcdce0cd95c769b6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: huitema
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 04:48:30 -0000

huitema approved this pull request.

That's fine. I don't know whether we want to mention ack-of-ack and ack-range pruning here. Probably not. But it should be very clear that while ACK only packets do not trigger acks, the packet numbers should be included in the ack ranges.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: