IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should receipt of multiple promises really be an error? (#2232)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Fri, 21 December 2018 03:56 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BC0130DCF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:56:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lsAaoxE-0son for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:56:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3170D130DD0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:56:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:56:24 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1545364584; bh=X9pjfJSqXdXz2jHNv+iMrGxGYNoqtn8XFPJxkcqa2Xg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=m4WTvGmQ7Zo5k4Xjr8jXUOlPBOE+MWQm2J1QRUQWxe8nN1xIqK59/Hfr3oqQJtRNp 6ufmFF8GyKZ3BJc7e74pa6Fkxs3pSW7/RZUHzKi34JrUiKpdKrd+aW8jaG4Xm2lG7z l7SBQsRkLrGI0IntZZVnT1pmRErKHcoz0rrKKKJ4=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4aba14dbe12c9c5f02c9c56f4df3c91c972a901b21f92cf000000011834266892a169ce177076e8@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232/449235866@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should receipt of multiple promises really be an error? (#2232)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1c646873c67_28883fd2722d45b886eb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/eJf8wmosLKLw-KgifJ5REK3R0EA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 03:56:27 -0000

I think that this is OK being different due to the substrate being fundamentally different (i.e., these are reliably delivered as opposed to packets which are inherently unreliable).  But I'm happy to hear other arguments.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2232#issuecomment-449235866

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email