Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change max_packet_size to max_datagram_size (#3471)

Kazuho Oku <> Fri, 21 February 2020 05:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219AA1200E6 for <>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 21:18:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.754
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5BdRnm3aF-zf for <>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 21:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580C4120052 for <>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 21:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 21:18:05 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1582262285; bh=XNgkJM3Ldfg0vDw4+BJRBLrDxaeOhTFTZsSp6KrgvSs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=nwp9Vk8fMAPc7IyH7HhgVYQBTnh8Q9o4hCAz5XyiwlS9NP2uNWjAnpEyHRINl0PIe 9cjEe/C7r9ftEAG3JzoKIcNuvQ0f6ool7v4rcL6MroOgrMeqEwOR7/Lsvo5wK3tgsY TwVTE8vy8N8pvFKYs1IROx6xr0pGX0Uv97Rif2/U=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3471/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change max_packet_size to max_datagram_size (#3471)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e4f680d7457_4f803fd3f32cd95c1064b5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:18:08 -0000

If we are to impose a limit on the maximum size of Retry packets, I think a value much smaller than 1179 should be chosen. This is because a Retry token that is as large as that would leave almost no space for payload in Initial packet sent in response to the Retry packet.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: