Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delayed ACK Ratio (#1978)

Bob Briscoe <notifications@github.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5044130E11 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:37:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Slz9BCvFFmgV for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ECDF130DD3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 18:37:35 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1541644655; bh=Pex0ugAy2yDV9CUJlt8APVmFV55kSRNYcpZsdPamhXs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Xk0+CJ2AQZrv8QUYFFkKOD8IuHusU1jdu8SE4j06Oab98KB7rHuK/mOvkdlSf/v8m 34aq2cefOBuHFo0uPFYld2DR3N3Mh/gvwwzphyLJJEkwp2FniscdYPM54LJYVJ0fSj CTT9A0nTee63nZq3xGQ4IDVS+FDLPM7pFlAvY5Z0=
From: Bob Briscoe <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab372db1a5b1c042af48b010ab9180655a2e9271d392cf0000000117fb636f92a169ce168acaf3@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978/436852616@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Sender-Controlled Delayed ACK Ratio (#1978)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be3a16fcab33_7bac3fceb2ad45c497330"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: bbriscoe
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/hvVNpYw7gRU01pqLZPkoESvtDb0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 02:37:41 -0000

Regarding whether the interaction mode is 'always repeat' or 'set and change'. I have no strong views. My goal was to suggest the simplest possible protocol that would induce minimal push-back from implementers. Also, perhaps one that could be back-ported to TCP, to leverage shared experience.

On the question of whether ack_ratio would change frequently, if the sender is routinely setting it to cwnd/8 (say) it will change frequently. Similarly if the sender has implemented AckCC (but I suspect AckCC won't often be active).

Whatever, this mechanism is not an invariant, so the approach can be changed based on experience.

@ianswett I've added goals (my subsequent scenarios posting was intended to serve that purpose, but yes that's good practice for a first post). 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1978#issuecomment-436852616