Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Skip a packet number when sending one PTO packet (#2952)

Jana Iyengar <> Tue, 10 September 2019 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2265D12003F for <>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qsohdo_fp2wq for <>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B222120019 for <>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:26:07 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1568154367; bh=7PA7U/2LB549aq10fZjp57ltg9Ot6+HXEtAjX1L4tKA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Fr/9XQgabxq6dLqMG8GI8YQtbGaUmNAKRWrNWlhTfS7SIKnPWB89fq3F9V+h8aFXU g4TFRN9QgqttkiFduXEb/Jh/f8cJtCNlRviqUL/RzWgXMSyxTJHfonOX8QcnAkPuEA 1N/KavvNd9vyrvy+0pq+qiabXSlemOUAxZbvi32g=
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2952/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Skip a packet number when sending one PTO packet (#2952)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d7822ff7648f_37fd3fa7b9ccd968630b5"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:26:10 -0000

This is a clever idea, but I don't think that we want to write it down in the spec. It's allowed by the spec, so people can surely do it, but we are talking about immediate ACK signaling in other ways too, and I don't think we want to encourage this behavior.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: