Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated ICMP PMTU section (#1412)

Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com> Mon, 18 June 2018 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822F4130E7D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uP5ty-9_5Lut for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44806130E47 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:30:44 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1529357444; bh=wC1SGMa+JR9r2PExcQObbbJmZsOkQ0wVsXASrxSXNyw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=AS0wsV7FunLYWBm6vk6wLTukF1iamwM2bsPQGpIjxIws02SARVWy3iqdsLypYl0co O0czK5zZ0Mbmo+c3wj6EyHuhObmgVd3EY0QduJFTV+OlN2E/JaUdREYCzWck1jrkwc 8sAusDJpl1fJ1jdW6n9I3XM321LL2oDv/g/BiUt0=
From: Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abb5e0b144459399ba345dcf3e2cdf171c929ba27b92cf00000001173fe68492a169ce13a079ba@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1412/review/129746932@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1412@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1412@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Updated ICMP PMTU section (#1412)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b28248449234_51532af1dcab0f60229072"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: igorlord
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/q6Sj2cQQLv3LKTCCYoCyIF2NP1k>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 21:30:49 -0000

igorlord commented on this pull request.



>  
-* Any reduction in PMTU due to a report contained in an ICMP packet is
+If an ICMP PTB message is received after handshake, and the claimed Path MTU is
+at least 1280 octets for messages with on-path validation or 1392 for messages

Somewhat arbitrary, examining various tunneling protocols out there to see what seems like a conservative-enough number that is not too small to be significantly concerned with degraded performance.  This number would certainly need a wg consensus.

The goal was to make sure that in the common case (no attack), we can switch to a workable PMTU immediately.

Of course, if the wg believes that 1280 is "large enough" to use it immediately, this would simplify things.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1412#discussion_r196232146