Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] NEW_CONNECTION_ID text is too restrictive on receivers (#3534)

martinduke <> Thu, 19 March 2020 23:50 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6C23A127F for <>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.008
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J8SHuSY2IaWY for <>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771163A1277 for <>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:50:15 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1584661815; bh=NcO5nZBEdB1JWyCajIk23OGU5cTvXX7DtiEhLyiujXE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RRv0dZ9MnT4tm2NV6tSuWWLna5dTcCJ6r2HTP1QXQ0ZAWVLDIryLxEjByKY7411vo dWAwnlhWazN0UtZacA7PK85DqwrSaJLbY+cQIheKI8+7g0aKhrIAVL16PE/ZFMlx2K PpFKW8UBR1idHFUj9JWAO4J8jQZE7DLJpg5J+rd4=
From: martinduke <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3534/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] NEW_CONNECTION_ID text is too restrictive on receivers (#3534)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e74053788667_25253fae510cd96c490f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 23:50:27 -0000

Yes, I concede that the original email was garbled. I read the original text the same way you do.

The issue is that if I decide to retire immediately without actually having the sequence number, that should be sufficient. Making me send it again after the NCID is gratuitous, and in at least one implementation creates state solely to track this corner case.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: