Re: Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work?
Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Sat, 30 April 2022 19:47 UTC
Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F06C15E6FF for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hHZBEISQZF46 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf35.google.com (mail-qv1-xf35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BD5FC15E6F6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf35.google.com with SMTP id ke5so7659726qvb.5 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=B3clTjPFpASE/pHVFsWNXV4lksQ71uCnkBECdRnl36o=; b=LD4jSqfY1jTCpaC6CsUZWl19kfBXnaUvx9fG+uossqTd6vX1OPbbe+/khnDAaUArQz zY0nDtqZRXdywkfaLJ3HBrdFRpZQ7Av9V+k7bFf65Ci3V1Zuqm9xsC3Sz8R1GUyNMs1z ei9D5vCmnh8LUqvkifbfFxX1NlbSAaUhMpaAdwdrL55WsqEh0ymyns6wKDmn3DAOTww2 c5Djz5W9TNUkJ3z7Trgzk6IBa3yMaUYNBQt6yMHsdDmeCsJ2hSGqgHNzfwKrUtzrQbRK hhWA5Rdj+GSgZsZe5bThEQ/bS6rILB1V35W2lDa/R9Hto6wPuUoezN6ewCKkxDX7YGog wiKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=B3clTjPFpASE/pHVFsWNXV4lksQ71uCnkBECdRnl36o=; b=WDD4iIuCUHRzED/1xt/O0PvbnWFtdOWM+gWhmzUutyFFzgd08CPZladd10nQqkAVOm BZPp6tBR78mlE1yt9pssgNwxZSKVK4ozWUyz8deXqDww1Qi+yH4T0AOuPlZacWElhHjE OVO5JZctCcjEfSKO5UV+r3D6EIuhyLDQq9VKjMBU9kBPzof3Ikds8vAm4R0nTUG9Uzzt 4AIC794fIAyIY6YD20iBQ55xnHRkqjZL9GM8keIIpt5kR5WD3gsun1HH8WrQnwZvyb51 pdmFCLrDIziZ33JlR1WY1/eA6Ri9uhqSzBGeCFijCrjAfv+gi75nE5HMaEKWXDPOMlli 06Mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530N3gghSVzBShSsZvwJ2dmoNzaMYSD2Ea1bq5ZZxp9kKCV995wJ uig1bbjnjwkov+YG2mGqc5oHImlUlqETJMN6YuS29zMn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznKH9flDpqf//xppHjRXzdWmNpsHYnri+OleeHMDtGBti/lBzX3jwVXw/4sWBI9QKKGO1v4ZAkk9G3ue0XvR4=
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5f88:0:b0:456:35c0:832b with SMTP id jp8-20020ad45f88000000b0045635c0832bmr4271415qvb.102.1651348038727; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a5d30a8d-4b0d-0d38-182f-c3c03400d0b3@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <a5d30a8d-4b0d-0d38-182f-c3c03400d0b3@huitema.net>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:47:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9oaJgUkppAVWe6vh326WrYGCu1ey7eRTYSq3BBu3j7JawQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work?
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003fb98a05dde46d1f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/6Geo6nJxcSKzS1EOY5p-w1NFzKw>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 19:47:21 -0000
Hi Christian, On Sat, 30 Apr 2022, 20:10 Christian Huitema, <huitema@huitema.net> wrote: > The datatracker says: > *This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired > Internet-Draft can be found at:* > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-ack-frequency-01.txt > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-ack-frequency-01.txt> > > -- Christian Huitema > Thanks for asking. The answer is no, the work has not been abandoned. Rather, the draft expired naturally due to the standard 6 month validity period expiring. The current document situation is unfortunate. The editors have indicated to the chairs that an updated draft will be issued soon. The chairs would like to remind all editors of QUIC documents to keep their drafts alive, in order to avoid these sorts of situations. If there are circumstances that make that difficult, please get in touch with us at the earliest opportunity. Kind regards, Lucas On behalf of the QUIC WG Chairs
- Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work? Christian Huitema
- Re: Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work? Lucas Pardue
- Re: Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work? Ian Swett