IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work?

Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> Mon, 02 May 2022 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ianswett@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F273C15E3F5 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2022 06:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mOt1BOGQPU76 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2022 06:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2FDC15E3F2 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 May 2022 06:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id c11so9785929wrn.8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 May 2022 06:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZS6zv+qh/myaxWRzd2gqOblX0r9Bvg4KhGT5ENftfLo=; b=bhpId7oKnF9zvBN/luFxei+hlA322IiuxuIXaGvCcQw2eU/JpTTMr5YY053wehM1C4 xI1TFAyVjdPAIKbb6VYo1m3i6/70WW4zW6ukkM2WEQprUPt0Dh5ZCrNli/dZwPEQroyD aqDlrGAqEbFVYhkbDAzdmbJCCFAVGswBr0zoKVEEz2LjElgAhgvuIareanLVEbT0UR3Q /JKlN2v8WeXqRwtugNpcYt7St+UnMGG0hdN3uc8dS+OsFlhIuEfKDWfuMFtIYP4Q6tnR b0XcGcliJG5U9kDVpFSzTdAv9/vehETqbEOzmWJma8jUKnZWD2o7XduGZPgPR8y3I3X/ Qslw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZS6zv+qh/myaxWRzd2gqOblX0r9Bvg4KhGT5ENftfLo=; b=Jt0x850Qz2Vnr4zO50D/i78Cp8V1PwWLLG415i9+LLlXqAZEVL3YSV4c1SVJG1A1lj Dfnn7uZjBrduXl4YMls00lbpvjcHntXy3CtcSLOMQKrSaVrT4H8BT6+5uDVd3zysX6dV YXYfDiP2vi/YcNsDHzjL0fr3CC7eJFmk0MsQ2CgQ4oYEX09j1ySHuH6zXW12bbPRA5DX stA7Prks/aJS7/+b7EmMV5ub8HwdV2Pzo+VyFHhLdgeI65jeyB975MuN5T+FCJZ4XD+K FqYxmhlnXOdZsbMB32JTdVABaG5197RVLXPN7T7uS/t4t2O+zH4poLD0dzQbXao2f94Q K2Sw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531LGdq1WS0NlutvAXVKU37L1kaw7RwC6TmCSpwFJqf78ryxrnSk Y/kEQBwk79KIeVAjYLj75CHjkaUEhRaCzJDKY3DY1tPJR6A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJ5Vvei0GpRDn5sM0cD5laqW6Vru6cjvVn7gbAQb0AusOktL6oIJs0fwGiFh0NT7G5Hwy3ZQ14cd1CxewBhcU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:3c2:b0:20c:584b:6a3 with SMTP id b2-20020a05600003c200b0020c584b06a3mr7184758wrg.260.1651498588664; Mon, 02 May 2022 06:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a5d30a8d-4b0d-0d38-182f-c3c03400d0b3@huitema.net> <CALGR9oaJgUkppAVWe6vh326WrYGCu1ey7eRTYSq3BBu3j7JawQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oaJgUkppAVWe6vh326WrYGCu1ey7eRTYSq3BBu3j7JawQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 09:36:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKcm_gNnovO_reiySy02XL9ygacneXkmybMOWEGtcw4Yrm7uvw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work?
To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba8cdb05de077a64"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/ikyWVRjEqkrwRH-XgYUwCum0faI>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 13:36:33 -0000

Yes, apologies for the expiration, the work has not been abandoned.

Thanks, Ian

On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 3:47 PM Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Christian,
>
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2022, 20:10 Christian Huitema, <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:
>
>> The datatracker says:
>> *This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired
>> Internet-Draft can be found at:*
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-ack-frequency-01.txt
>> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-ack-frequency-01.txt>
>>
>> -- Christian Huitema
>>
>
> Thanks for asking. The answer is no, the work has not been abandoned.
> Rather, the draft expired naturally due to the standard 6 month validity
> period expiring.
>
> The current document situation is unfortunate. The editors have indicated
> to the chairs that an updated draft will be issued soon.
>
> The chairs would like to remind all editors of QUIC documents to keep
> their drafts alive, in order to avoid these sorts of situations. If there
> are circumstances that make that difficult, please get in touch with us at
> the earliest opportunity.
>
> Kind regards,
> Lucas
> On behalf of the QUIC WG Chairs
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email