Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work?
Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Sat, 30 April 2022 19:10 UTC
Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807EDC15ED4D for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.877
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.877 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_PDS_SHORT_SPOOFED_URL=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bp1ib_NBZzyu for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx36-out10.antispamcloud.com (mx36-out10.antispamcloud.com [209.126.121.30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF0FC15ED4A for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xse295.mail2web.com ([66.113.197.41] helo=xse.mail2web.com) by mx259.antispamcloud.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1nksTx-000End-0G for quic@ietf.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 21:10:29 +0200
Received: from xsmtp22.mail2web.com (unknown [10.100.68.61]) by xse.mail2web.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KrJpF1Y92z6GV for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.2.14] (helo=xmail04.myhosting.com) by xsmtp22.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1nksTt-0007EA-35 for quic@ietf.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:10:13 -0700
Received: (qmail 11589 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2022 19:10:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.107]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.58.43.172]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail04.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <quic@ietf.org>; 30 Apr 2022 19:10:12 -0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------S2Zs5iDANZCXzjxaV00EAP0e"
Message-ID: <a5d30a8d-4b0d-0d38-182f-c3c03400d0b3@huitema.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:10:11 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Subject: Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work?
X-Originating-IP: 66.113.197.41
X-Spampanel-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Username: 66.113.197.0/24
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=66.113.197.0/24@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.15)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: Pt3MvcO5N4iKaDQ5O6lkdGlMVN6RH8bjRMzItlySaT9WLQux0N3HQm8ltz8rnu+BPUtbdvnXkggZ 3YnVId/Y5jcf0yeVQAvfjHznO7+bT5x6h2yQpzTslcOqazQkKtAFKj/EwzSHE5FGYwwjsNRPCCbj lXDknmSQi6fruHzqdHfmD6wdmZPcItWbGe10hXJtXL4FsauCVkDjmcYJdU3yWp7KuHNaaKdg7iBE ZefdsNUFWKwa/wzJUjmazeC7Imcaq0aGdqf32kZOFNvUb7QSGxQ6V51u76v35b1wNe/MvdLK0iWX QXXTLFLETKH72XTe2+J9PgaoF8SQHto3le4zsHTaeQtlKubP6iUTjj6yPARK6buALVaA782LKxg6 vRmng8N1aLhXqdc+jC1RcnVud53D5caUhbVtvqItBqoizkEt9O20UjkwI0v+LOlw05G4BS+iyyNq bT8dUMXMJ4tUCMj6G37ZfAMLceP5aNHPt26RBupu5v1nytoNnc138GfEJRQ2qC7jjynPIHPNqSn4 QTXUjLjYWQt1/5xnQymMoPsgr/U0flMcy2Vi/IcBgY4arPaiJ1W6hAyiRC61jekdwIcXNugoOEbH RyFULpSjm7hMIABpqqRGKyDs8xujM3cqBeOl1vvorVlRuGVSovFiMe+xMjJzc3DW+Iy9XN18DcJo ydAM+g0ND6jZZeky5K/oEnFzsC48bTEFY06/YbB87Ww8G0LoS8V3Mt1pta8qAcLtCB3G1CwpaI3Z 4ESkMWDVJEenxBoIht3V0nekAoxXAqbvaMxGSAwE2dpf+RdWPfiyuLfHqAnAj7rgKH7+eCmmu7TE lgWggP3Q6OyiHZ9OClShcA6Xvva2QAVEjpqzANap+28aWyCRVT7YkY7LckVcGq+WDp5TDBGgmTQe Y9CFA713qFZSq8Fx+9otn0aqja8VKPqpdskk5LxBR/9t1zMMkdu6/R2FM84kxYRFSvC1IDg1BRW7 hzp8w3iHcOwbVtsmWfnQGGis4EvbR3jXsI0ESXwhBU2hwt/J18C+HygJl/jEzm1SsR8v3aJbN/NZ fa8pHhHaz+HPa0HAgEx4sWDF
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine11.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/L3xMervnHQaGLdTQe7Db7Uase4c>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 19:10:36 -0000
The datatracker says: *This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at:* https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-ack-frequency-01.txt <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-ack-frequency-01.txt> -- Christian Huitema
- Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work? Christian Huitema
- Re: Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work? Lucas Pardue
- Re: Did the WG abandon the ACK Frequency work? Ian Swett