IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: negotiating Packet Number Protection

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 07 September 2018 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E08D130F6D for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2NcFpcbrcCBJ for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A1E6130F67 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id l202-v6so24021662oig.7 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 17:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PyWmyUs/aCCCuPVUm47meBk47dc3G0wHqURyjyN0KUc=; b=eunayHkKA3fWgbMh1QRC2+q/SuWOmqhcqVz4hvwzaCgIAo2u5OeYRH13UNSlo4x5yy 0XvgwwqX5GuEgFaogMrVYm48bcGrZOCs3WEKOQBQusufY7lodZ9JXt3LyDjqloPPSmkZ L1Qsozln+1ZRYzotPpZrZ2NJ1Ms5Fa1o74fvx5ZVj3totKvqntgZuJgXo6Ia0fnRnwOg mXHfspJAlaOLt+N0AlvU/fw2LuHIWARe0HrGksauhu+iSBXC0PpR6UTNh8re2VqpQhpg 5Q4+N/ZaNqqJUL3utHGvvF6Qxw+lYe4w5flkev7TqF8T6t8QU592mEmzaq5gRsrEbcDz nWXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PyWmyUs/aCCCuPVUm47meBk47dc3G0wHqURyjyN0KUc=; b=EFA63BbkA1yU7+qn4oV8r1CeAOVHxqnIk2WI4SD2OnNSgKYHk7Ogrl7OL6c5GSWve6 yqkAm86Qq4uHenx5iwpYspd1LWJleM3BCW/v+2wWhN5pv/WX8MTpFIuGm4h4i30p2Jnb vf6dXEMtZGrY+6ho3uUIn5wCicHujGQKTWu+c2rZ7FGiGwXhSSIASnZw8m12N17UKpfu lCnGRaC4XU3QNWGabCuAzKXGucv/KfMqdwGhIOzUXH2YDeB/2oA68xJ8JnB5+TohhujA ehsfY4FqB3CPqmVxRQD8QAMdv0NEqNJehPy8G5lZyFb8UQ21oS//eHbrso49lI1kERUZ aNIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AUbImbhU3QgOWz4hMjrk9vwaGateni+QO0+DmpSjjRdUYWW2CO xDkDOilTke8KezOBEyV3Z4teVTwHnAAiCfuRBExiFw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYjK/blLC92jCRJbK52nLsO2M89T5ItZ8hFspPgwulGvukB0Wm2AI+GtyZlQvIrEkgG7xLoAZGC88rkvlynGIk=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:6541:: with SMTP id j1-v6mr4965975oiw.157.1536278758897; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 17:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM5PR21MB01393FE7097A16C7A68EA7BE95010@DM5PR21MB0139.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR21MB01393FE7097A16C7A68EA7BE95010@DM5PR21MB0139.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 10:05:48 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnViOSQOYeEL4bL_hq6jPDaGR-G+O=A96C78+X4mheWaxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: negotiating Packet Number Protection
To: Gabriel.Montenegro=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/AqATPFqnbFCMMpCqZOVagY_m4ao>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:06:01 -0000

This is an entirely appropriate use of transport parameters and it
looks like the design works as intended.  I tend to think that the
IETF doesn't need to publish this - this sort of extension is why we
have relatively loose registration policies - but I'm happy to have
that conversation at the appropriate time.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 8:55 AM Gabriel Montenegro
<Gabriel.Montenegro=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
>
>
> We just submitted a draft to negotiate Packet Number Protection. This would allow disabling it in environments (e.g., in a datacenter) where it may no be needed if both sides agree. Browsers, of course, would probably not bother with this.
>
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-montenegro-quic-negotiate-pnp-00
>
>
>
> thanks,
>
>
>
> Gabriel, Nick, Praveen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email