IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: negotiating Packet Number Protection

Christopher Wood <christopherwood07@gmail.com> Mon, 10 September 2018 22:19 UTC

Return-Path: <christopherwood07@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC37130FD6 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FKrNofAZgm9D for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98763130FB8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id y3-v6so1997015ioc.5 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lDo/VuwzMwm6gwKFkEUMeQsFGRvvOBi5v+sDiQzH6M4=; b=ELgn259AotP1QJxLTuBKcScldkKoeSvUFleDHN344cIZAYb7I2bMtbbnJqULkLme/a TrCPIw29oCJCnmb8lOOppc3oQpp2uAAxS9qZqnnDRiwtUtNOQyZGYn9dRN4xyDMNqKPL GVmQMRn9dZnrHS0upubgztktCkrhxLthlnOKUVtIvJm7x6un01A+CYZ7yvUC+f9Crbkn KlH/zNJKON87I6YpoZ6/6693tzoCJ2CaEL2XB+t9mnwYEdAmntTuJ4wUZl0E+A4zXbZO r8QKWOc6bl3lihRDWyYzfWiHuKVcu6j93p4FQT9S0EM2n6o2RQTOXRVN6+dEFddvAsXP cIBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lDo/VuwzMwm6gwKFkEUMeQsFGRvvOBi5v+sDiQzH6M4=; b=gnxwhVO1cUar1b699vn6dqM2fXLNdqhSIehERl3J+eogQPKaucueHhKeGTJa/DLYqj 5Tp75nCLwmjZ+A69fRaR91NAJqfPkJhjHLCbfeJ3wvn5WsHKMi82wMygPH+r57uz2VAx uIV7y1GDIYtwUhL1BUqvO3RHfec7g3vu33qySPKzLRFVMK5Uxb50whUpG+b78N+nvC4t kwYlCZ7tZtwj6QUXOBFhKrh7aPD8sLxrx+Fo6KTwdLh9npcVm7h01rmh9sR2lR7ElmVF f5Z4sHNflxPKWhW4oc59I2Uw1i6Yudup2O3h3EdfNspaPSG/nLPbcqAM1jqpd0HXnAss AMAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CKx3ZiXLp47hTSSoDAlQaH9/EseLRUjIXGyvriv6AwAud49LaD RkMGCVDAVLUSAOrznYU2r//noMqv1aIKbPAh5fw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbyWSAdVu6XjpC9+c3z8RPtbOZJa9JgSOxU+lWQspZuz/wf1w5F2Bufd7VRNVgs4sLfOJdmPo7Q/UaQDGKFzVk=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:a70e:: with SMTP id q14-v6mr18199849ioe.204.1536617954538; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM5PR21MB01393FE7097A16C7A68EA7BE95010@DM5PR21MB0139.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnViOSQOYeEL4bL_hq6jPDaGR-G+O=A96C78+X4mheWaxg@mail.gmail.com> <0d5fb94c-3a79-ac40-ee12-193d190d4408@huitema.net> <DB6PR10MB1766D14FF9B5C1971B72471DAC000@DB6PR10MB1766.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAKcm_gPWf=GZoMr3Nf2k75oRifK51+ZkUbH42-cM2Oa1Smy6Sg@mail.gmail.com> <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BB968F3@bgb01xud1012> <e96841a5-4700-c6ac-d853-5a5df63a8667@huitema.net> <DM5PR21MB01395E641DD5850501353A8895050@DM5PR21MB0139.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR21MB01395E641DD5850501353A8895050@DM5PR21MB0139.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
From: Christopher Wood <christopherwood07@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:19:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAO8oSX=MhgUSYa2XWF+_Rsd4g80=hEe5a+yRTstrTxmj99CEDw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: negotiating Packet Number Protection
To: Gabriel.Montenegro=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, quic@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/GW_PZaSiZdo3DjeU554-h7ZfeGM>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 22:19:17 -0000

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 3:01 PM Gabriel Montenegro
<Gabriel.Montenegro=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks folks for the comments and suggestions.
>
>
>
> They seem reasonable, namely
>
> relaxing from a MUST NOT to a SHOULD NOT on internet-facing clients
> requiring disable_migration as well.
>
>
> New version here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-montenegro-quic-negotiate-pnp-01
>
> Is this simple enough to include in the transport document? Alternatively, it would be great if this could be published as an informational (or experimental) document to make it a stable reference.

Albeit simple, I want to echo Martin's earlier comment in that this
should remain as an extension (if anything at all). I don't think this
sort of knob should be added to the transport document.

Best,
Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email