IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Invariants draft

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 04 December 2017 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257E1128D44 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:45:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MxXZ50AHSE5s for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:45:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA79128D40 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:45:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id f69so12900404oig.10 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:45:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fr+pm9hn7fJRS9elP2uW3uDyXvAl2dr/uCmvUXIWxXE=; b=O5IkQyTTp8qllShZio2oNDTEOQ/E23CAMKXGVNq4dJZGKw4htZrs5rCVYAxuNU6Npo AMmEBxiYlSTB1hxMRZxYk8zZOMoO1renB0nwC2tl1rEmVFVCxuRSsBFxGILf4jgeKqnN fNOnAvt1Dj6fz1QOsZjiLKcDSORd2l9L6fQQtKiHRTu/bs0poZcL4OV9GxwdqC9ntO/a 0tErfejGaxvvtHSYmraw54poS2BZuH51aLLk9GUXgLXsMWAzumXaq5LCkvOkDNUAohTC MU3NFGiaHocfAMHhVlnt+nlTbZsNoPOqaQJauFbgPevmff57RLaVO8mYovd8cexe5isp 0U4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fr+pm9hn7fJRS9elP2uW3uDyXvAl2dr/uCmvUXIWxXE=; b=p22+PtLT8P/6XxsGxlBUnCAHTM0O8CNPBjINr1ZRS6p6xpTonUzPUm7dgHyUJszSMM 6gEK2AKMwUj/HdSfquRGypZ76bSsitvn1LvbpGLhJT+2Pbow5v0nB8J/pqW+9kIbIdwE xnWkVKAv3Wixok8ERbUTvhFp/z6uxBmzndnlK1Jd61OqJGWZZHCfTpFYOEyWQoPSC9Gx DUPbtJf2+fLc5ZpYBWUtuz8dhTs8CBYtZ5pJ5J+2rAiGgw4uSJ4IV6QG88Gj6OCgs2dA 38vrRtWwpdBu4PHJa0ChofFx9/i1uxC+J2TDNAcmlmcOfXPn/LfKZRo/STla1g14gX51 2TjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4NGcCDrrNe+lIsu65qfe0gTN1dMyehOU615JWWwWCXB4RdogpW cOqTT3XKvlHMxPWdjqK7jGINwFR4r7K9OotvEPdlKg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaFHLrCUhqgwxCnXLW1Ndmf+ATs0gyWDLQMpKECOBwG7ezOJlCkUmaSmzo/ohPf5TmLGYP/QWy4ux0T11k6UkA=
X-Received: by 10.202.180.69 with SMTP id d66mr8231686oif.92.1512427523213; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:45:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.8.11 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:45:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <813A9ABD-86D9-4BC2-A5F6-F862F75D6CEB@trammell.ch>
References: <CABkgnnVr7jQ2=fFM+OOgk0-=Fseze8fT3xwWBOj-4CWTOtbq1Q@mail.gmail.com> <440a603c-2924-a260-c477-ecb42a84ec5c@huitema.net> <CABkgnnUBYegURBTK-sH51jmfDnc8KTyaRE3EYH-V385=be-wXQ@mail.gmail.com> <813A9ABD-86D9-4BC2-A5F6-F862F75D6CEB@trammell.ch>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 09:45:22 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU5QAN4ZSagdccbXf_Hf0Vo5x7JeLrDHApKZ8gNPmVYqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Invariants draft
To: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/HPntxEpnS9B81Qcg4p210hBO-b4>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:45:26 -0000

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> Might I suggest, though, that defining Version 2 milestones now (I'd suggest that "whatever is shippable in late 2019", whether that includes MP, PR, both, or neither, is a good target from a preventing ossification PoV) might make sense in terms of committing the WG publicly to exercising these mechanisms in a useful way?

I'm on board for that.  Separately, it would be nice if the solution
to the QUIC/realtime multiplexing problem was to define a version of
QUIC specific to that application.  That wouldn't be as good as two
versions of QUIC-for-HTTP, but it would help.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email