IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Invariants draft

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 04 December 2017 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D0A128D40 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:57:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h0xDtOIO8eEh for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:57:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B0A128D64 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:57:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id u10so24952377qtg.2 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:57:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kio68I+8Osa0rsAN8QNfDfd4zMYhPSL/zd4wiPpkRhM=; b=cC1X5lYSrfLPqJuqsAA1FfvxMbperoKYepb1PyKwpEHrXvu1zUV2QnaOs/TAkz5QZc v6EyJr+TDFN/V/lQPhY0EgUhiAtSJSonMP7RSLU53zOasO/vMATmcbO41awfDBVy/vuZ 4WTiXjQ2K8MzqihNIWSf/FxOxAKAk+kPlgpuspQXHMChHq0Id/rWp24VS4O+cUn4LKUG ZvhoZqV1EsAzI3giaFxhHVNG9vWXdAxqeGPA0U1SIbATxPjcKdR/jTrub9GcLoBCxLQH K0onKG6HoDEmibUjHusCjnJgxsqwRL088ap8KdEjdIjqk4L6mHCGxZ/XTwAhWFbpg16S 62mw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kio68I+8Osa0rsAN8QNfDfd4zMYhPSL/zd4wiPpkRhM=; b=ERvuTEU95yd+31Upw4PzyxvMSnV4uxPaSeUYFIuLPrvOwRCHeCOETfb98ENiaIypbt opYCWXA6OGUnetEokpSFn+kzqpcW+FcTxp6vBztZdL+oKd4Ah6rqUwMXVA06uZYPWm7/ l9j+GZVd/gWVsbS7y6FpXLyYE+CF5xP8d1rLOl94wjeQuEcxZe1wO38Z/Y/vl9lzs+Zs Wq1iTgyvG4PqSDenU3X+3yJUL2kEnQ22xLO/glGgY6cpmK12/j/DlzC0kKe5Lwlt7PKt Z3pYXDXDxAEOAbo1QFITdMZvLUqvXSLq7eths8KI43nvrFgJpFWQnMHIGN5DSbmzlba5 GaXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJhwYHkhPaZYBKDTCsqudIe8ml7rcU26xbS5fqEohrwHWaB71wI mabmM2QRar7pZ5hiH3lfLjxSH7Bo3Vad2PMGWLs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZhCMq6pIGl0Coeax8l2GNKOxtxcqiX03YxHT79owtxcmDc5I4JyZBEjQt4qZhZtg19drIFt4cFGCwkARE61P0=
X-Received: by 10.55.155.198 with SMTP id d189mr19958990qke.347.1512428261221; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:57:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.36.169 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:57:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnU5QAN4ZSagdccbXf_Hf0Vo5x7JeLrDHApKZ8gNPmVYqw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnVr7jQ2=fFM+OOgk0-=Fseze8fT3xwWBOj-4CWTOtbq1Q@mail.gmail.com> <440a603c-2924-a260-c477-ecb42a84ec5c@huitema.net> <CABkgnnUBYegURBTK-sH51jmfDnc8KTyaRE3EYH-V385=be-wXQ@mail.gmail.com> <813A9ABD-86D9-4BC2-A5F6-F862F75D6CEB@trammell.ch> <CABkgnnU5QAN4ZSagdccbXf_Hf0Vo5x7JeLrDHApKZ8gNPmVYqw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:57:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDWtcYdjFVFdJ33fSqi5NX7fU8zHDDP3TzAE+Npxer=fw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Invariants draft
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0d040e422ccf055f8ba5e2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Uv3lrafaBOYivpEwfnap8cknxQc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:57:44 -0000

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch>
> wrote:
> > Might I suggest, though, that defining Version 2 milestones now (I'd
> suggest that "whatever is shippable in late 2019", whether that includes
> MP, PR, both, or neither, is a good target from a preventing ossification
> PoV) might make sense in terms of committing the WG publicly to exercising
> these mechanisms in a useful way?
>
> I'm on board for that.  Separately, it would be nice if the solution
> to the QUIC/realtime multiplexing problem was to define a version of
> QUIC specific to that application.  That wouldn't be as good as two
> versions of QUIC-for-HTTP, but it would help.
>
> Not that the cast of characters is all that different, but do you
anticipate that being the job of this group or RTCWebBis?

Ted

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email