IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Invariants draft

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 04 December 2017 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570B9128D69 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:00:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PG1xyDSEGMFm for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:00:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x232.google.com (mail-ot0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4CCD128D40 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x232.google.com with SMTP id y10so16249228otg.10 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:59:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RN3LLc6PFXNtlJNE+whVqJq4CETAvZezm9M/co9dhwQ=; b=i26gTwSJYF147nazA125yXiNjOafnRRmunInfsgJ7A/2uvCJDtVQSHT23lNy6rlkRM NYYdTOMN5/a1KrzYD8FPGu9ZN9QZ6Epc4vFMcVSTzM6wnHnF3rndbo+otloCOG1hLajr +SLP847eNurB/GWZ68MZTBqLrqZ4tjCuFsrUz1G8BkFeCvZgQ+nnrjC+glM62T0YOg5T c+kWhoLKwDSvjPwmvSfLwEROnSABYF0e59M0eGk8ZIUaYY6VZpiB72nBw9rC45Q6kCO6 UchwwTdn+TDfYXoM81uMAmJzNuLL5pTZOjjMj7/gv1N45T6+vpo1Qpd+/Lw42Ohf2enw WfYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RN3LLc6PFXNtlJNE+whVqJq4CETAvZezm9M/co9dhwQ=; b=Hay7YPFEhbmUgaipBtNheVquWY0UNfw6KT5RFLn22IuEvaNYe3ts54XbtU6RSzrmpZ 5JMeBwwcD/1RHa4d3oES5aoZ2UrRxySVg/rGTKj8uSsH10vQh59HnZcv6sgZQBe+jAwW aV31+BvzgveEb5c1W97SgF85cvqeHzLBXaqn0NL3vxNbl9zVW8krmAVjzLCCHQZgVBnl KA0sUamqhdauiROT2CaDzjpPLnq4POBo932WE14ixR9a+v+X3AYB0N0lj5yqtRNF6itC 2qnY5GuHZdIKqo6Cr2WaLjqNMBiymC3tl55TUr2aviPIe2rvEnVgybqynaG6jBnhyZOt 9ddg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5sCBf/sW7zEvLpPS2w+JtVz+k5+XI29wbhvIdmpnYCuQeuZnvx febHcL2F3QEjx/vsjOumiDF33cARTPtz2Yvg6Jg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbJ6TluwPP7X2lpZhYmAb1hzRmKMCwrOvFliCU/6jeISmBlVs6IMF/hEnglTYeI48YKbATY9uMmWlecEvY+T5Q=
X-Received: by 10.157.74.4 with SMTP id h4mr16981063otf.308.1512428399280; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:59:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.8.11 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:59:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMDWtcYdjFVFdJ33fSqi5NX7fU8zHDDP3TzAE+Npxer=fw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnVr7jQ2=fFM+OOgk0-=Fseze8fT3xwWBOj-4CWTOtbq1Q@mail.gmail.com> <440a603c-2924-a260-c477-ecb42a84ec5c@huitema.net> <CABkgnnUBYegURBTK-sH51jmfDnc8KTyaRE3EYH-V385=be-wXQ@mail.gmail.com> <813A9ABD-86D9-4BC2-A5F6-F862F75D6CEB@trammell.ch> <CABkgnnU5QAN4ZSagdccbXf_Hf0Vo5x7JeLrDHApKZ8gNPmVYqw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDWtcYdjFVFdJ33fSqi5NX7fU8zHDDP3TzAE+Npxer=fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 09:59:58 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX8gihMQr4Q9OfnFHFS6ZLmn7=kQs2q2zPD7WWu-dFFhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Invariants draft
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/WPklU6JnlahlIJ_qmSurRMjtMO8>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 23:00:01 -0000

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm on board for that.  Separately, it would be nice if the solution
>> to the QUIC/realtime multiplexing problem was to define a version of
>> QUIC specific to that application.  That wouldn't be as good as two
>> versions of QUIC-for-HTTP, but it would help.
>>
> Not that the cast of characters is all that different, but do you anticipate
> that being the job of this group or RTCWebBis?

Much of the discussion here has happened in avtcore, who look after
SRTP (I think).  That would be a fine place, as would this group
assuming that the effort is cheap (as it should be), but that's just a
DISPATCH-style question.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email