IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus call for Late-Stage documents, pre-IETF 108 edition

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 29 July 2020 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C1F3A0B24 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VBDSrGs4BtTd for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D459A3A0B26 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:d404:4033:1b4e:8603] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:d404:4033:1b4e:8603]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E817B612C32; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:43:28 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1596030209; bh=4EB0vHy7D88/OY2DNBbGGTujO7gyTFkX3Tk0tsB/w+Y=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=rKXQpEprnsgyHAAbnrdsfo+fcWbSUlkp3k4ylB2WmtjCMHUVMWaHZ/NAYb57tPSdE uZD2gPFqZpks94qzOmDmhL8jQ12OIoBI6zdEdPGqCj2v6TbKq9pu0cxVHMPnl2XF48 RI6hGQS9KyIt6ospnvDI0w+tlHT1naA8c3OqxS1Q=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <C177F5BA-40A8-4493-96FA-12BC53FF61A3@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F11E381F-5EBA-4472-8489-B442AD31809D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Subject: Re: Consensus call for Late-Stage documents, pre-IETF 108 edition
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:43:27 +0300
In-Reply-To: <CAKcm_gM73QaQ_eruoy7YNnrhUF_G+SNPzFxA99RF=m7yCa98Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Gorry Fairhust <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "jri.ietf@gmail.com" <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, "huitema@huitema.net" <huitema@huitema.net>, "quic@ietf.org" <quic@ietf.org>, "mt@lowentropy.net" <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Ian Swett <ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <CALGR9obkGENj_Brk5D29Z6HB-yq9TbPLjUXSNbotAZJ0LRHgSg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMQNX_qbXT_qCmyWuXdLeL2=ar0u9yKB=c8M7=WNB4oVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1909E24B-73CC-4129-9B64-F0A3BE2D74D7@eggert.org> <CA+9kkMCRfhNayN5jM5g3Ckwst4GGxR++be5p7ea1jYkE3MbzqA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOcZd9=Th4T=rm0i+EGnG1i8bjembf20ungVYaDSpjusQ@mail.gmail.com> <7b5c104c-36b6-3fe1-4e5b-0e42cc9e2b36@huitema.net> <74ef5430-8e3f-4b6b-b81f-b25443e975b4@www.fastmail.com> <32c098c3-24e4-1d7c-fdf5-33761adacfa8@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <FA3E4F14-570C-4A28-A2C8-EA2B3937E614@eggert.org> <0ee0a444-3910-3e71-54aa-581431495648@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <3644F334-F148-4FF5-AE86-015C073871AC@eggert.org> <c28e05f6-637d-9183-11db-f8daa8b9e7c4@huitema.net> <CACpbDcc86pgVpcN7DHb2s8aRGjzCC4RNjYPnGyDHhUCWg-G9zA@mail.gmail.com> <337cd3d0841e9d94a034aa2402ac2a030af550f8.camel@ericsson.com> <CAKcm_gM73QaQ_eruoy7YNnrhUF_G+SNPzFxA99RF=m7yCa98Sw@mail.gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: E817B612C32.A113B
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/OqjoaIj1u0kdhpxaORC2dHmD2nA>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:43:48 -0000

On 2020-7-24, at 21:01, Ian Swett <ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> One additional note: Clients MUST change Connection ID if they intentionally migrate, so a server can use the lack of CID change as a signal that it was likely an NAT or other unintended path change.

If I modified #3842 to take this into account, would that address people's concerns? Something like:

"...unless the only change is the other endpoint's port number ***and the connection ID did not change***" (new text between ***)

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email