Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 20 September 2020 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9AD3A0E27 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 00:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=XX42BOVF; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=VcYYDXQ7
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F2rQiC5HVfCX for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 00:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDAE93A0B0E for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 00:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0BE5C00B3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 03:32:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 20 Sep 2020 03:32:37 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm3; bh=hcM1mMYHz4wf64GL1pn6ClLniHa4LkVkUg277hNh4rE=; b=XX42BOVF mGcvmX0qfI+M9O7PRXzFsra9joBTrCeHAoDbtMSMy6fAwMu2igXWZdDL2avhI8fh wtjOmZCeANWiVsp0nbF2tsWyeuxxMhyJCzubNSR4tfPBA/gmCbuiaTqCCoDHSK8Y o07b73BZCPMEDyRrNJx0LHqfoGIKd9teeg0wAI9Lig22rwRd8KAgadtCp3VaCUyz 3FegtOZqT6lN9HUPxgSyWVfCFB+V95zU3arcXsieLqbP1TVw6ArwgP9Pe+QDtXmD 4vf8oW7i880YhRweLB/LnT82UrAKw8e2y+06Mx4iY8Y+p6L63bM+WbfS4U43gYqB O2pE6S8wp1yDMg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=hcM1mMYHz4wf64GL1pn6ClLniHa4L kVkUg277hNh4rE=; b=VcYYDXQ7vznUTHsuyZF8x7fATPo34p4C5xCH5wgI8YdOA hFAspEbZIVay8ak3CCxZ++QyQIYlIipaYHTSJncaQc94NIL+Kz64oXmFThfJJMng 19AZ0l8YY6x5XrlZaNCupvDvxNtZHwlCFYO0A2ZqBa7S7y5o3dUnAjIp860v5p1t vmPXBAU4vkn6nb3mmA4s7G6Q84vsVUuT8jntmTWYKFOtwMxh/tt/E813sDY5h5df YCXW2+2/g57LeQZhzemnJsjPOfAs582iN2PVC1oT+wBnZ4uCH4U0SNDDQ7aMnp5V oEaoe0LZFH8Hw3oyQvhChr05BvtK/cWZ7wcbMPnvQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:lAVnX1VrW6kEQNEK6p-Z1_4B5suCpBrNeeVIOtfxXN-578ZRzMNHlA> <xme:lAVnX1ktrS6bIpUQUObrOG1ow4-UnVLQyQZc0AczhPqAHR3JraSw2eXt4kgjMY0_1 RZW9vVoSDxFvPrsRw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrtdelgdduudeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejne cuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicutegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceu ohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefgfefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieet necuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfkphephedvrddujeelrdduieefrd ejieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:lAVnXxad5mk6MH6EHzNAdSLaCsoyhEATodctBtKRyj9_xqFtDKiboA> <xmx:lAVnX4USfnFAxq7haF2LBEeyLvYlncre0bcu41c_cj0x2Kxs3ujeWg> <xmx:lAVnX_kkMTxCWriQ7d-mvsKALHWPBqHyOwheakMvwLjfHsr9zzrkcw> <xmx:lQVnX3sJUVLJp3Vk9HhjJGqbdJqHCyTVbDMZ8cKTxIG21dg0020MJA>
Received: from fv-az60.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [52.179.163.76]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B66113280059 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 03:32:36 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============7717323634487971094=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20200920073236.B66113280059@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 03:32:36 -0400
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/b4iOhpKj1xucsWymqgzPvxtYOvE>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 07:32:42 -0000



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+4/-0/💬23)
  4 issues created:
  - move security-critical client requirement on push to definitive sections (by royfielding)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4101 
  - Should invalid TP result in FRAME_ENCODING_ERROR? (by dtikhonov)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4099 
  - TLS spec should not specify mapping of frames to packets, except for CRYPTO (by huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4097 
  -  SCID is omitted in Retry Pseudo-Packet since draft tls-29 ? (by Lingtaonju)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4094 

  6 issues received 23 new comments:
  - #4101 Move security-critical client requirement on push to definitive sections (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4101 [-http] [wglc-post] 
  - #4099 Should invalid TP result in FRAME_ENCODING_ERROR? (6 by dtikhonov, ianswett, larseggert, marten-seemann)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4099 [-transport] [wglc-post] 
  - #4097 TLS spec should not specify mapping of frames to packets, except for CRYPTO (3 by LPardue, huitema)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4097 
  - #4094 Is SCID  omitted in Retry Pseudo-Packet since draft tls-29 ? (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4094 
  - #4087 Conflicting error codes (11 by DavidSchinazi, huitema, janaiyengar, marten-seemann, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4087 [-tls] [design] [wglc-post] 
  - #4076 IP restrictions on Tokens makes them of limited use for non-anycast DNS load balancing (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4076 [-transport] [proposal-ready] [wglc-post] 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-0/💬2)
  1 issues created:
  - Keepalive design discussion (by william-zk)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/53 

  2 issues received 2 new comments:
  - #51 Any suggestion about transmit client ip from quic-lb to quic-server? (1 by Lingtaonju)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/51 
  - #50  A bit maybe used in cid  to mark whether the server info encoded in the long header or not? (1 by Lingtaonju)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/50 



Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+4/-1/💬3)
  4 pull requests submitted:
  - Add warning about request forgery and client-side migration. Fixes #4086 (by ekr)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4104 
  - Codeowners (by larseggert)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4103 
  - Use TP error for invalid TP (by janaiyengar)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4100 
  - Clarify how packet number is encoded before ACK is received (by dtikhonov)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4098 

  2 pull requests received 3 new comments:
  - #4104 Add warning about request forgery and client-side migration. Fixes #4086 (2 by ekr, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4104 
  - #4089 Remove recommendation to not include tokens (1 by janaiyengar)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4089 [-transport] [design] 

  1 pull requests merged:
  - Codeowners
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4103 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation