Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues
Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> Sat, 11 September 2021 23:50 UTC
Return-Path: <ianswett@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6F03A16E9
for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -18.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.499, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id PLdqS6Zb1Lue for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com (mail-yb1-xb31.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF3AE3A16EA
for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id r4so12184617ybp.4
for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=Ykm6x0T4EBw/2Q6OQeuVQ/5DmNpqBSHqM+mhB+qTIDk=;
b=WHXLimlEM1oWmgqxLebmBDeK9oqU97QO8q0vjBBWRgIHuqoIja7FMJdmulrloeY0xj
VkrNAAr4Q8uqijeOkyhiSdGfT5PTWLDiCcCt0PXcMcqpmy0ho3CRwEDEx5AUdGJARMTF
cUXNhiAlruAM5a6slGzPDAPCYJRykifcKVxQUwF5f0TDUKEkROO+famYT4oBmBrRSqc6
tTyt+kid7euIjaU2PjrX2lR5zHfgYWSuv45Zxutv1P5W+9edzhxr6Jaczar9jcEPVhEs
bLWDB4vjP7B4/JSNMS8e3Wcei3qh4AZtLLZaxE51FzteDIHruVzUX+ENYQ8ad5znML4l
I4kw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=Ykm6x0T4EBw/2Q6OQeuVQ/5DmNpqBSHqM+mhB+qTIDk=;
b=XHgqHGJv0Lv+sEv1GAOwEXl2WcFU0Z1Rmffh3WRGrk47gjIKlzQnRleV+vD5Grg5hF
04w3BJmT3eceP4wrGAPDPOo+0tQQdtb31/gliK+iHMRKWuI9PF1sOOeYJNU5gvxMMQnH
deekF8NOwLvB6FCe/cyHOxhFywmNROehyRUOIPuVsWUshc0RAlg7kG2XO5MPQWzWDopy
fKrG6raEZkGqRs/78cEEfXp/mWTzhj9ABtB+aEmg6dtcV83uWYb4KC2EelpO4q1v74pg
3eCBgAtmCQWZYQfr/u+i3Y15JW8Hx9zwQla3igcFYQQJsza0OqKEJD8L/aGaZhZZxJQw
SpQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533i0oF9ovDQzucNjd8hlAM++cct5GFMnEnwVcG3Dj7pDLQcQfRa
EMxCe9TIGVO84mU71Ym1Vsg4TP/YpQM944d76UMwaAZ3UoKA3g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGaNqyMH2QA1RFzhcQ0k2HjkTreCzB6OdZ2M08jlMvqCEvYlz5FI2O/pasXM7XpnJzP2TrCMMLo0wwAhcXPdc=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6cc1:: with SMTP id h184mr6140977ybc.240.1631404227591;
Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 19:50:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKcm_gPe_0E3Yje=qT07hC2uSt+srWT7EwbhiYNsPq8Q+pFFiw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Cc: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000796cfe05cbc0e5b1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/kQ7eo6okZiwA5_H-LDVuYy1rvMU>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>,
<mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>,
<mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 23:50:33 -0000
Most of the outstanding design issues were discussed at the last IETF meeting and had clear resolutions. As such, I think we're close to being ready to ship this draft. One issue not discussed(#48 <https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency/issues/48>) regarding ECN CE and a new issue(#65 <https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency/issues/65>) adding a NO_ACK frame are notable changes and have not received wide discussion, so I wanted to publicize them here before merging any changes. I think both changes are heading in the right direction, and both have PRs you can comment on. I'd like to merge these in a week or so if there's no pushback, so please take a look when you have time. Thanks, Ian
- Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues Ian Swett
- Re: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues Martin Thomson
- Re: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues Vidhi Goel
- Re: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues Christian Huitema
- Re: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues Matt Joras
- Re: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues Martin Thomson
- Re: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues Roberto Peon
- Re: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues Ian Swett
- Re: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues Martin Thomson
- Re: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues Ian Swett