Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues

Ian Swett <> Sat, 11 September 2021 23:50 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6F03A16E9 for <>; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -18.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.499, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PLdqS6Zb1Lue for <>; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF3AE3A16EA for <>; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id r4so12184617ybp.4 for <>; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ykm6x0T4EBw/2Q6OQeuVQ/5DmNpqBSHqM+mhB+qTIDk=; b=WHXLimlEM1oWmgqxLebmBDeK9oqU97QO8q0vjBBWRgIHuqoIja7FMJdmulrloeY0xj VkrNAAr4Q8uqijeOkyhiSdGfT5PTWLDiCcCt0PXcMcqpmy0ho3CRwEDEx5AUdGJARMTF cUXNhiAlruAM5a6slGzPDAPCYJRykifcKVxQUwF5f0TDUKEkROO+famYT4oBmBrRSqc6 tTyt+kid7euIjaU2PjrX2lR5zHfgYWSuv45Zxutv1P5W+9edzhxr6Jaczar9jcEPVhEs bLWDB4vjP7B4/JSNMS8e3Wcei3qh4AZtLLZaxE51FzteDIHruVzUX+ENYQ8ad5znML4l I4kw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ykm6x0T4EBw/2Q6OQeuVQ/5DmNpqBSHqM+mhB+qTIDk=; b=XHgqHGJv0Lv+sEv1GAOwEXl2WcFU0Z1Rmffh3WRGrk47gjIKlzQnRleV+vD5Grg5hF 04w3BJmT3eceP4wrGAPDPOo+0tQQdtb31/gliK+iHMRKWuI9PF1sOOeYJNU5gvxMMQnH deekF8NOwLvB6FCe/cyHOxhFywmNROehyRUOIPuVsWUshc0RAlg7kG2XO5MPQWzWDopy fKrG6raEZkGqRs/78cEEfXp/mWTzhj9ABtB+aEmg6dtcV83uWYb4KC2EelpO4q1v74pg 3eCBgAtmCQWZYQfr/u+i3Y15JW8Hx9zwQla3igcFYQQJsza0OqKEJD8L/aGaZhZZxJQw SpQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533i0oF9ovDQzucNjd8hlAM++cct5GFMnEnwVcG3Dj7pDLQcQfRa EMxCe9TIGVO84mU71Ym1Vsg4TP/YpQM944d76UMwaAZ3UoKA3g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGaNqyMH2QA1RFzhcQ0k2HjkTreCzB6OdZ2M08jlMvqCEvYlz5FI2O/pasXM7XpnJzP2TrCMMLo0wwAhcXPdc=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6cc1:: with SMTP id h184mr6140977ybc.240.1631404227591; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 16:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ian Swett <>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 19:50:16 -0400
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues
Cc: Jana Iyengar <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000796cfe05cbc0e5b1"
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 23:50:33 -0000

Most of the outstanding design issues were discussed at the last IETF
meeting and had clear resolutions.  As such, I think we're close to being
ready to ship this draft.

One issue not discussed(#48
<>) regarding ECN CE and a
new issue(#65 <>) adding a
NO_ACK frame are notable changes and have not received wide discussion, so
I wanted to publicize them here before merging any changes.

I think both changes are heading in the right direction, and both have PRs
you can comment on.

I'd like to merge these in a week or so if there's no pushback, so please
take a look when you have time.

Thanks, Ian