Re: arguments for Edge

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Sun, 27 June 2021 15:21 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5907c434e2919aba66d5f4729f39571f@tum.de> <3dbaa780606f9b0aa4bdffd01fc9287f@tum.de>
In-Reply-To: <3dbaa780606f9b0aa4bdffd01fc9287f@tum.de>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 11:20:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwgdcx_ak4HqJYxjKbE7tZ7eT4AEPX=hEt+oQDaStBMwcw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: arguments for Edge
To: Aaron Ding <aaron.ding@tum.de>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000091bcd705c5c0ebd5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/nxhsyVQ13MyjiCk2lImLrcybyIE>
Precedence: list

The paper states typical latency is 30ms

Thus we are limited to 15 round trips per second.

I have a 960Gbs = 120 GBs Internet connection

Assuming 1260 byte packets, that means 95238 packets a second

So we must have an average of 3174 packets unacknowledged at 30ms latency

Get latency down to 1ms and the number of unacknowledged packets goes down
to 100.





On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 5:15 AM Aaron Ding <aaron.ding@tum.de> wrote:

>
> Is the motive for Edge (i.e., latency) diminishing since its first
> concepts were formulated more than a decade ago?
>
> A recent work to share on "Revisiting the Arguments for Edge Computing
> Research":
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.12224.pdf
>
> Aaron
>
>

ACM SIGCOMM HotNets'21 DL in 30 days Aaron Ding
arguments for Edge Aaron Ding
Re: arguments for Edge Dave Taht
Re: arguments for Edge Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: arguments for Edge Aaron Ding
Re: arguments for Edge Phillip Hallam-Baker