Re: Call for Adoption: draft-duke-quic-load-balancers

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Thu, 12 December 2019 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95441209E6 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:57:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HieFgMFhRH3Y for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:57:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4109F1209DE for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:57:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id p17so3335644wmi.3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:57:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rFwlyz6TatSrJdEqXX/DiUiaoQowUWmlY4AlTRy6R64=; b=SUbm6uMrOAGRkMFNKMKQ2gPfX7w+nbJfk9aP4gupp/yUd+fysiGzb0zscdGIyb4w7r c2aEgGOkbepK3JlvglxibOgPVpjU0nLfeBsPwfYgVekOabaV8gr08rNKUT4F/IDs18ch xVBYfk7FUpsIj5WgWRPOVMMSzSIzDhLPIwtsblhKH9kPLq5HlSo/qkkRnUwkrhodDwyr FQAnb5CxmhwsHWIDRWebEkYB7s1SuyCz87P/hY+3UpkT4zhmyR2ANpY2nBiHUoZvaWgc sJpDOYBV2FeUUygnStJamb6rxO1ITOyRhb74azotWAbQP6yIEO383RgkXcEMww3WMzo8 DeGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rFwlyz6TatSrJdEqXX/DiUiaoQowUWmlY4AlTRy6R64=; b=d7aCmrlIIMi1B4W5RfUo6xkTNDcV65uzf42pH5ihBYbTTthK8HGOH7zKJAY746f/KG 4oEzbKGfD6nfET9CyCg8pJUaxVkTg98KD1HgW26INOZMUZ7mXYuUDQv3YnFIrGaflTlZ oOqexnSsdFT5wa8tZ/OQVr6ZW1kmtWq41D0h7GNpougwhda7awKwMOfMDykXpgRri2c3 Z8vvEX3HNDt8We6rjXDDCfJK6YZEChAe76KRY/9+ZbFL8BFexDXKzruF1mSUFMhauq8f Vt4PwWkFeJpn/xty32O4tpzZpt6p6VLQNnGBxjEGx5gMdnLd0W+znREZf62Z6meTa7U4 jfYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVIBbxz1htDhaFkfWSlUIHq3jAEp6a0dlNFPEU41eoHp+xPtQ+q a9zt1yqKOfHmFsH9fMQhYSyz5ybeYmUMvWxXxz8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzj+7371Q2UnUmeSrSB9utrPbaZeQX5xxiRcLRic2YtG/0Cob2FyCmjIzY2NED1JjEOnPSjYzin7wsKExMVvaM=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4b0a:: with SMTP id y10mr8117110wma.78.1576169858266; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:57:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <B30B3746-B033-48F0-808E-335FD282BE42@mnot.net> <20191212131406.GB2364@ubuntu-dmitri> <CAN1APdf68bvwo5-pPD3T+WuhPht3o68Kp4eeMKq8imW6AWoDtA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN1APdf68bvwo5-pPD3T+WuhPht3o68Kp4eeMKq8imW6AWoDtA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:57:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM4esxTBUEaCokmdk7xU6+pWa48zTp0XBzW9zd873SBhhfROpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-duke-quic-load-balancers
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mikkel_Fahn=C3=B8e_J=C3=B8rgensen?= <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000081fc08059984a414"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/rRUyVwm1vKN3WxaYnwSGIo3y0xw>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:57:43 -0000

I have a working draft that removes the in-band protocol. I don't want to
confuse things but I'm happy to publish -07 if that makes things easier for
the chairs.

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:40 AM Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>;
wrote:

> I’m concerned that the current form does not allow for long lived
> connections along with connection rotation. In praxis this means that
> connections will be killed after some time, say after 30 minutes or 2 days.
> While you can argue that a deployment can make its own choices, in praxis
> there will be cloud provided load balancers that will enforce such
> behaviour.
>
> For example, outside of QUIC, Google cloud L7 load balancer will currently
> kill web sockets after a configurable interval. There is no way to allow
> some connections to live longer, e.g. based on seeing live traffic on the
> CID.
>
> Mikkel
>
> On 12 December 2019 at 14.14.24, Dmitri Tikhonov (
> dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com) wrote:
>
> I support adoption of this document by the WG.
>
> - Dmitri.
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 08:37:28AM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > This is a Call for Adoption of the following document:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-06
> >
> > The Working Group has discussed this document for some time, most
> recently in Singapore.
> >
> > Please state whether you support adoption of the document by the Working
> Group, and any additional information that you feel may be helpful.
> >
> > This call will end on 15 January 2020.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
> >
>
>