Re: Resolution of design issues identified during IESG Review

[Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 11:32:35AM +0200, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> in response to the IESG Review of the QUIC transport, tls, recovery and invariants documents, individual GitHub issues were opened and the documents moved to the "Revised I-D Needed" state. (The HTTP/3 and QPACK IESG reviews will happen at a later date.)
> 
> The editors have been hard at work triaging and responding to the issues. Thanks to a concerted effort, most of the issues have already been resolved. Some were deemed to require no action and have been closed, some were Editorial issues that have been addressed by PRs that have been merged into the working copies. The remaining issues have been identified as Design issues, see https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Adesign+-label%3Acall-issued
> 
> As previously mentioned, we are boosting the visibility of these Design issues in order to allow the WG and the IESG to comment on the proposed resolutions:

I'm satisfied with the proposed resolutions for my issues.

I'd also like to take this opportunity to apologize to the editors, chairs
and WG as a whole: despite my significant efforts, the quality of my review
comments failed to meet my expectations for myself, leading to a lot of
essentially wasted effort in translating ballot comments to github issues,
explaining why there is no issue, and closing out issues with no change.
I'm sorry that happened, and needless to say, I will specifically endeavor
to avoid a repeat next week for the h3 documents.

With remorse,

Ben