Re: [radext] Proposed new charter text

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 24 March 2015 11:47 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9993D1A8993 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 04:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id br4ujmcPbzIl for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 04:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from power.freeradius.org (power.freeradius.org [195.154.231.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4131A88E6 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 04:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4245B22404DA; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:47:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at power.freeradius.org
Received: from power.freeradius.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (power.freeradius.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xx180lqnNChW; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:47:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dhcp-943f.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-943f.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.148.63]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5CBC2240192; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:47:15 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.WNT.2.20.1.1503231554360.3600@SMURF>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:47:15 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F66B5EF0-AA6F-4713-996B-FB4CC5FF2087@deployingradius.com>
References: <5502B836.5000100@restena.lu> <alpine.WNT.2.20.1.1503221133420.3600@SMURF> <9C712CB9-7834-4049-9318-54E769F7661D@deployingradius.com> <alpine.WNT.2.20.1.1503221518060.3600@SMURF> <2DB68EA1-97A6-4263-9E7F-9BD24B567C7A@deployingradius.com> <alpine.WNT.2.20.1.1503221852040.3600@SMURF> <5FA970CC-2E05-4EFC-8AE6-840D334B28E4@deployingradius.com> <alpine.WNT.2.20.1.1503230923000.3600@SMURF> <1A6EF1EA-3412-4AAA-9646-3FD18EC0C4E4@deployingradius.com> <alpine.WNT.2.20.1.1503231554360.3600@SMURF>
To: Peter Deacon <peterd@iea-software.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/AvdMIx5m1lmcUPOwKfV0pDfN78Q>
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] Proposed new charter text
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:47:27 -0000

On Mar 23, 2015, at 6:03 PM, Peter Deacon <peterd@iea-software.com> wrote:
> I recommend effective means of isolation of administrative domains be explicitly required as part of any charter for this work item.

  I don’t see a need for the charter to be updated.  Security is always a factor in every work item.  It doesn’t need to be explicitly called out.

> Even if many of details are left up to implementations there has to be a reasonable enabling means.  Without it I don't support the work item as resulting product would not be suitable for deployment.

  You’re assuming that without the charter update, everyone will ignore the problem.  I don’t think that’s realistic.

  Alan DeKok.