IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Proposed new charter text

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Tue, 24 March 2015 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AE11A877E for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGN-9FcAxARk for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 044231A8784 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6352066F; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:26:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BNX7jgWZygzL; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:26:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-50-177-26-195.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [50.177.26.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:26:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 55EF18720D; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:28:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
References: <5502B836.5000100@restena.lu> <alpine.WNT.2.20.1.1503221133420.3600@SMURF> <9C712CB9-7834-4049-9318-54E769F7661D@deployingradius.com> <alpine.WNT.2.20.1.1503221518060.3600@SMURF> <2DB68EA1-97A6-4263-9E7F-9BD24B567C7A@deployingradius.com> <alpine.WNT.2.20.1.1503221852040.3600@SMURF> <5FA970CC-2E05-4EFC-8AE6-840D334B28E4@deployingradius.com> <alpine.WNT.2.20.1.1503230923000.3600@SMURF> <1A6EF1EA-3412-4AAA-9646-3FD18EC0C4E4@deployingradius.com> <tsl4mpbb8r6.fsf@mit.edu> <5511104F.2030006@restena.lu>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:28:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5511104F.2030006@restena.lu> (Stefan Winter's message of "Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:20:47 +0100")
Message-ID: <tslpp7y8o7a.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/Ze3T4t84qEmBhZDbAcOG5uuvPac>
Cc: radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] Proposed new charter text
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:28:50 -0000

Ah, I didn't catch that the COA proxy document was labeled standards
track.  That's not OK unless we're moving 5176, which I don't support
absent some serious changes.

So, yes I support same status as 5176.

--Sam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email