Re: [radext] Proposed new charter text

[Peter Deacon <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Alan DeKok wrote:

>> No unfortunately this does not work across administrative domains as 
>> operators are able to affect operation of unrelated sessions belonging 
>> to other operators without the checks in place.  While all parties 
>> explicitly trust roaming infrastructure they may not necessarily trust 
>> each other.

>  i.e. what you’re saying is that there is a requirement for home server 
> A to NOT be allowed to disconnect users for home server B in a visited 
> network.  That is a *new* requirement, which doesn’t negate my comments 
> above.

I recommend effective means of isolation of administrative domains be 
explicitly required as part of any charter for this work item.

Even if many of details are left up to implementations there has to be a 
reasonable enabling means.  Without it I don't support the work item as 
resulting product would not be suitable for deployment.

regards,
Peter