IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-nai-02.txt

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Mon, 18 March 2013 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6A821F853C for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9D9yQN+M1u4F for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8850321F8548 for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (unknown [10.1.10.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE2592010D; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:17:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id C30DC41CF; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:17:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
References: <20130128155031.8392.45953.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5147172F.8090100@restena.lu> <08fd01ce23f5$cf8d0b90$6ea722b0$@augustcellars.com> <tslfvzsvd24.fsf@mit.edu> <091f01ce240a$6705a860$3510f920$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:17:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <091f01ce240a$6705a860$3510f920$@augustcellars.com> (Jim Schaad's message of "Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:57:12 -0700")
Message-ID: <tslip4ott3t.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: 'Stefan Winter' <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-nai-02.txt
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:18:20 -0000

>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> writes:

    Jim> Sam, In the descriptive text that Stefan provided, he said that
    Jim> the AAA client was configured with the fact that the names were
    Jim> the same.  Thus there is no reason for it not to do the mapping
    Jim> on that information rather than normalization.

    Jim> If we are talking about delaying the normalization, then we are
    Jim> looking at what the AAA client as oppose to the AAA server is
    Jim> looking for in the un-normalized name.  AAA proxies are always
    Jim> going to want to see the normalized version of the name.

Yeah, I agree his example is not the best.  However, I suspect that both
aaa-servers and aaa-proxies will perform better if given the
un-normalized name.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status