IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?

"Matt Holdrege" <Matt.Holdrege@strixsystems.com> Thu, 27 December 2007 05:52 UTC

Return-path: <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J7lfJ-0005yr-4E for radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:52:22 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J7lfG-0000ZO-Sq for radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:52:21 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>) id 1J7lbL-000EsC-8d for radiusext-data@psg.com; Thu, 27 Dec 2007 05:48:15 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3
Received: from [208.179.69.44] (helo=WV-MAILSRV2.strixsystems.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Matt.Holdrege@strixsystems.com>) id 1J7lal-000Eoy-9W for radiusext@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2007 05:47:59 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:47:35 -0800
Message-ID: <ACF43FD466CF5B4FB63C345423C84D715AF926@wv-mailsrv2.strixsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <00af01c8480c$5d526ef0$17f74cd0$@net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?
Thread-Index: AchH8+QgyomKZ9OBSR2hHFBZMYNg5QABjGnQAAGsRgAAAt9pkAAPrF/w
References: <003401c83a92$db6ed850$924c88f0$@net> <47729084.8060206@nitros9.org> <005d01c847e8$20c81f30$62585d90$@net> <4772A741.40303@nitros9.org> <007e01c847fa$cbae1a00$630a4e00$@net> <ACF43FD466CF5B4FB63C345423C84D715AF907@wv-mailsrv2.strixsystems.com> <00af01c8480c$5d526ef0$17f74cd0$@net>
From: Matt Holdrege <Matt.Holdrege@strixsystems.com>
To: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@comcast.net>
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org, Alan DeKok <aland@nitros9.org>
Sender: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793

No kidding. I think my first RADIUS WG meeting was almost 12 years ago at IETF 35. Take a look at http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/96mar/area.and.wg.reports/ops/radius/radius.html and read the minutes.

You might laugh at the irony, or more likely cry. Are the current AD's aware of the history here?

-Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Zorn [mailto:glenzorn@comcast.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 11:12 PM
To: Matt Holdrege
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org; 'Alan DeKok'
Subject: RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?

Glen,

Didn't you say this same exact thing here a year or two ago? Or am I
stuck in a time warp? Or is this group stuck in a time warp?

[gwz] Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose... [/gwz]

-Matt (I'll go back into my hole now)


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Glen Zorn
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 9:06 PM
To: 'Alan DeKok'
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?

[gwz] 
I understand, & sympathize; I think that it's important to remember that
a
major reason that we ended up in the position of having multiple
external
SDOs defining their own mutually incompatible VSAs is that we (the IETF)
refused to address RADIUS' problems in a useful and meaningful way.  We
have
an opportunity now to ameliorate if not solve that problem; I don't
think
that we should pass it up.
[/gwz]


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status