IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?

"David B. Nelson" <d.b.nelson@comcast.net> Wed, 09 January 2008 15:48 UTC

Return-path: <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCdA9-0006xm-4C for radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:48:17 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCdA6-0003kT-Rw for radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:48:17 -0500
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>) id 1JCd5e-000N2p-Iu for radiusext-data@psg.com; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:43:38 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3
Received: from [76.96.62.96] (helo=QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>) id 1JCd5a-000N2F-97 for radiusext@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:43:36 +0000
Received: from OMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id b2uk1Y00217dt5G5906L00; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:43:32 +0000
Received: from NEWTON603 ([24.61.11.96]) by OMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id b3jH1Y00724Kx1C3Z00000; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:43:21 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=Gn-g1Pkd9IgA:10 a=_u2oDMy8V6R5umpGq-4A:9 a=Ez1Ez2YR_8XTwn_FEW4_LscOTVoA:4 a=mFGnfPYPwAgA:10
From: "David B. Nelson" <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>
To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
References: <003401c83a92$db6ed850$924c88f0$@net> <47729084.8060206@nitros9.org> <005d01c847e8$20c81f30$62585d90$@net> <4772A741.40303@nitros9.org> <007e01c847fa$cbae1a00$630a4e00$@net> <47732E9D.4030803@nitros9.org> <00b401c848e0$2f0e9c60$8d2bd520$@net> <4774B67D.7040603@nitros9.org> <005601c8496f$9e430910$dac91b30$@net> <477C60D6.3020008@nitros9.org> <003e01c851c1$fad525f0$f07f71d0$@net> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A047BF686@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <E7CCE8A83907104ABEE91AC3AE3709A011B1AF7A@exchange.bridgewatersys.com>
Subject: RE: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:43:27 -0500
Message-ID: <004e01c852d6$61d61c40$011716ac@NEWTON603>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <E7CCE8A83907104ABEE91AC3AE3709A011B1AF7A@exchange.bridgewatersys.com>
Thread-Index: AchSfy9slkyWKStwTW2l6JAtWhKJmAAVslhg
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Sender: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370

Avi Lior writes...

> An attribute can appear standalone and also be included in a group 
> (for that matter, in many groups).  The definition of the attribute 
> is the same in both cases, but the semantics is different right?

I'm confused by this.  The "definition" of the attribute consists of syntax
(format) and semantics (meaning).  What does it means to say that the
definition is the same but the semantics (meaning) is different?




--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status