IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Proposed charter text based on IETF-115 BoF

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 22 November 2022 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F92C15258A for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:06:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XGQAjaLBfPTk for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33DFDC15257C for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:06:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC461800D for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:32:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0ZoqRAot3nn9 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:32:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143181800C for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:32:09 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1669141929; bh=f+D8sS+IwQ7x8Q4VAEzDYbhNWfy881DFzlPDXN4LAcI=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Atq0GCApffKe9csKx0WQM5ekWutSogGyrbnkEHHPnGqhKi62rtpbPmrgSRmfma9pP g/vU8+C8qYLivKrJ13J51BJUdN2JHUADoB2bNpv1HyM07CkizvojF/oOQmuslGtmVF AOglYfWun5fUSYSNWZ3UyMT4m9ATXgb76w8ZEWRJrOJNY6044IP6LTfqL7Qui4QF5u yxkYRtAHPKxjBUtjDh/MtWUQQ+/37qTdPXgcg+uR3WHeDKZRzriUPlNeZeutT0rXcv SlBvtu41Yw/FogfKLlOUEOFELH7HR8IHBdKJux4jDPduOVR5OIwmqerQHM/BoeCuB1 Ilw8SrhVWxq7A==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A771FD for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:06:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: radext@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <81A072E3-88E2-432F-8672-A068DF41FAB4@deployingradius.com>
References: <CAGL5yWYTzvN1SgL8ordMvenhDGMs-EZw32+U32_4jeR9mqGciQ@mail.gmail.com> <81A072E3-88E2-432F-8672-A068DF41FAB4@deployingradius.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:06:32 -0500
Message-ID: <8250.1669140392@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/V3Z-_GdmWEP7JVQKdcmevzP3ZUM>
Subject: Re: [radext] Proposed charter text based on IETF-115 BoF
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:06:39 -0000

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
    >   After the meeting, Karri, Heikki, and I had a long discussion about
    > the documents.  One of the outcomes was that it may be useful to add
    > two items to the charter:

    > 1) Write a document giving guidance on using TLS-PSK with TLS and DTLS.

Wow, I'd sure rather encourage use DANE keys in DNS or copy-and-pasted raw
keys rather than PSK.  I can see that there is an upgrade path that might be
important...
I think that the major hurdle for using RPK is possibly that we haven't made
operators aware of something clearly and easily copy and pasted.

    > 2) define (or investigate defining) a "hop by hop" signalling packet.

Do you mean a hop-by-hop RADIUS packet, or a hop-by-hop DTLS packet?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email