Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Mon, 10 June 2013 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1188221F88D8 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wvbHL-R3MSa7 for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc4-s22.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s22.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E9321F8546 for <radext@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W96 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s22.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:48:56 -0700
X-TMN: [+JmyWd173F+CnD6Aqnljk8HA2K0Wm81sv4QJtIVuXSI=]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU169-W9693996E7E4D2C59FDE2CC93840@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_f8616681-d982-4f5a-886f-c55adce7c41a_"
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>, "lionel.morand@orange.com" <lionel.morand@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:48:55 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <A95B4818FD85874D8F16607F1AC7C628CDB0A5@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <066.e99973544c7878635851fd28a6cf5689@trac.tools.ietf.org>, <27657_1370418838_51AEEE96_27657_5798_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E1FB0BA@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>, <A95B4818FD85874D8F16607F1AC7C628CDB0A5@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jun 2013 17:48:56.0197 (UTC) FILETIME=[C76B0350:01CE6602]
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] #153: Section 2.8 Access-Info
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:49:07 -0000

Joe said: 
  
"Access Status is advertised to the supplicant in EAPOL-Announcement Messages which are separate from authentication messages.    I would it expect to be communicated in any message from the AAA server as it is possible you have some level of access before authentication completes.   Access-Info needs to be included in an Access-Challenge message.  "
 
[BA]  As I understand it, the use of the Access-Info attribute is to allow for the setting (and reporting) of the Access Status, which might be provided in response to a request (or not); protected by MKA (or not); could relate to a particular NID or for the port in general.   This raises the question of what the usage scenarios are, and whether the document covers them. 
 
For example: 
 
a. Is there a scenario where the Access-Info attribute could be used along with Service-Type="Call Check"?  For example, if a request comes in, could the RADIUS client generate a Call-Check message (e.g. with the MAC address of the supplicant in the Calling-Station-Id parameter) and then use the information in the Access-Info Attribute within the EAPoL-Announcement sent in reply? 
 
b.  Is the Access-Info Attribute always used to communicate status for the port in general, or can it sometimes be used to indicate the status for a particular NID?  If the latter, how is the NID to which Access-Info relates communicated?  Does the inclusion of an Network-Id-Name Attribute in the Access-Accept indicate that the Access-Info Attribute is NID-specific? 
 
IEEE 802.1X-2010 Section 11.12.2 states:
 
The Access Information TLV provides the information specified in clause 10.1 (see Table 11-9) for a particular NID or for the port in general (if the TLV is encoded before any set TLV).