IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] WGLC for draft-ietf-radext-dynamic-discovery-09

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Fri, 14 February 2014 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8121A013D for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:01:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=1.049, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fA-zHD4QmlZP for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:01:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuor.restena.lu (tuor.restena.lu [158.64.1.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E221A01AD for <radext@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.restena.lu (legolas.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::34]) by tuor.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785EF600050F4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:01:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CF51690F5; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:01:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from viper.local (unknown [158.64.15.194]) by smtp.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 575381690F4; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:01:28 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52FD0119.40009@restena.lu>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:30:01 +0100
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lionel.morand@orange.com, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
References: <15BCB5AD-55A0-4C74-B9BB-67448122EFF6@gmail.com> <23ABE552-71C9-4231-82B0-0D1861C922CB@gmail.com> <11892_1389706983_52D53EE7_11892_12055_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E43D683@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <52D54673.9000600@restena.lu>
In-Reply-To: <52D54673.9000600@restena.lu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LWnbGbAmcTVuibnsIxWpUvtWhPo3c90w0"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/fPgdDWOHhDtKRlqlnkn6gouqzyQ
Cc: "radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-radext-dynamic-discovery@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-radext-dynamic-discovery@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] WGLC for draft-ietf-radext-dynamic-discovery-09
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:01:37 -0000

Hi,

>> [LM] I think that the case for initial Accounting-Request is missing. Sorry if this point was discussed earlier on the mailing list.
> It may well have been, I don't remember it though. :-)
>
> You are right; where the NAS has a User-Name for its Accounting record,
> it would need to discover a destination using the algorithm, so this
> should be reflected in an added bullet. I'll do this for the next
> revision update.

Fixed for -10.

Thanks!

Stefan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email