IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Control of RFC 3580. Transfer to RADIUS WG possible?

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 06 October 2015 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC0E1B2A0E for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FEOOwOI1L_6u for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from power.freeradius.org (power.freeradius.org [195.154.231.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8841B2A2F for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAF722408A9; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 21:05:34 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at power.freeradius.org
Received: from power.freeradius.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (power.freeradius.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPyu1AMcYEwF; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 21:05:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.20.14] (69-196-165-104.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.165.104]) by power.freeradius.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B16982240490; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 21:05:32 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH47h2yk19BR11TaOnnZGR_8FnLgnCf7zJUukRP7GJq4sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 15:05:30 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <451E43F5-44DF-4651-8372-49BC90DFEC5A@deployingradius.com>
References: <CAGnO3dp-=6cODkAgV7R6vjTYWz0BXoODY3kPO37-iJ9ve-407g@mail.gmail.com> <5310AA34-D3C1-4B12-A691-1DF427904DF1@deployingradius.com> <CAHbuEH47h2yk19BR11TaOnnZGR_8FnLgnCf7zJUukRP7GJq4sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/mGMDSv7pU1D3mgP0cR6fjTLrtUs>
Cc: Nick Lowe <nick.lowe@lugatech.com>, "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] Control of RFC 3580. Transfer to RADIUS WG possible?
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 19:05:41 -0000

On Oct 6, 2015, at 12:14 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  If the document is simple and has no objections... it might take 3 years to get published as an RFC.
> 
> Is this a result of the workload of Radext, editors, or process
> problems?  If it's process problems, let's fix that as I don' want to
> see drafts taking 3 years to publish. If it is workload and priorities
> for the WG, that is another matter (we can look at that as well).

  It's been the process for as long as I've been involved in RADEXT.  Call it 10+ years?

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email