Re: [RAM] Ramblings about "locator"

On 2007-06-15 05:03, Ved Kafle wrote:
>> Marshall,
>>
>> ...
>>>> Maybe the essential point is that a locator can at least in
>>>> principle be mapped to topology and an identifier can't.
>>>>
>>> If in Ethernet what is essentially a random number (the MAC 
>> address) 
>>> becomes
>>> a locator then maybe the distinction will never be crisp.
>> Well, that horrible thought crossed my mind. I think I disagree
>> with Jarno's comment, because as soon as an Ethernet address
>> gets into a spanning tree it has become a locator (at level 2).
> 
> So, the distinction between an identifier and a locator is dependent on
> the avalaibility of routing/switching infrastructure. 
> If networks possess routing/switching insfrastructure based on a
> identifier namespace, the identifier simultaneously functions as a
> locator. 

My original RAMble (sorry) ended thus:

  Maybe the essential point is that a locator can at least in
  principle be mapped to topology and an identifier can't.

I think that's correct and actually consistent with much that's been
said. A slightly different way to say it is that a locator is a
handle for a route.

     Brian

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
RAM@iab.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram