[Rats] Re: Call for adoption: draft-deshpande-rats-multi-verifier-04 (Ends 2026-04-24)

[[e-mail]]

Dear Ned and all,

I support this work. IMHO, it is important to break down the big box "Verifier" and to investigate its details.

A+
Ghada.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ned Smith via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2026 4:32 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: [Rats] Call for adoption: draft-deshpande-rats-multi-verifier-04 (Ends 2026-04-24)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION : This email originated outside the company. Do not click on any links or open attachments unless you are expecting them from the sender.

ATTENTION : Cet e-mail provient de l'extérieur de l'entreprise. Ne cliquez pas sur les liens ou n'ouvrez pas les pièces jointes à moins de connaitre l'expéditeur.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message starts a rats WG Call for Adoption of:
draft-deshpande-rats-multi-verifier-04

This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-04-24

Abstract:
   IETF RATS Architecture, defines the key role of a Verifier.  In a
   complex system, this role needs to be performed by multiple Verfiers
   coordinating together to assess the full trustworthiness of an
   Attester.  This document focuses on various topological patterns for
   a multiple Verifier system.  It only covers the architectural aspects
   introduced by the Multi Verifier concept, which is neutral with
   regard to specific wire formats, encoding, transport mechanisms, or
   processing details.

Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption of this Internet-Draft by the rats WG. Comments to explain your preference are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and include this message in your response.

Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be found at [3].

Thank you.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deshpande-rats-multi-verifier/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-deshpande-rats-multi-verifier-04.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-deshpande-rats-multi-verifier-04

_______________________________________________
RATS mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.