IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rats] Re: Call for adoption: draft-deshpande-rats-multi-verifier-04 (Ends 2026-04-24)

Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de> Thu, 23 April 2026 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
X-Original-To: rats@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rats@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E961E1BB088; Thu, 23 Apr 2026 07:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1776954636; bh=NKFKv2+3otzO/IVaXnZDNvNQzqYpR2wQ5wuF1XETak8=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=JELF3uQE+bhreFYGCI5j/eKEQptHsBPnECu68DOgJUeJ0rftLyAmdq+xUzi1x8rRn BuL+zR6Z2vvu1mIoIHASkcLMLRmKcwNW+ibhiSJpL5ITa13YfKYkZuTKKxcg4sOkmB 7xyDQr5xZAX0MOg/j/TkCqNWyP3ZjevsQWcpvVAE=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tu-dresden.de
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rn7oTp48yKoa; Thu, 23 Apr 2026 07:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de (mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de [141.76.32.220]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24CE2E1BAF1B; Thu, 23 Apr 2026 07:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tu-dresden.de; s=dkim2022; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To :Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NKFKv2+3otzO/IVaXnZDNvNQzqYpR2wQ5wuF1XETak8=; b=woBl0S8u/oIjlJZxYCsMmQI/kY QIuGOv8EzyMljxCek3vtA3h1tqH0DzzyDw5r7BKn49A7QrD12miW6f6mgcEOnLhFTYkNBct2UN0sj 93VuC/uIpNBgM5EbeP8J/QZaiu3IdwFQ96nhHcqckJObqiaa6n8a+hNz2Iuq2eEXeo8sFp+3GaMNn uLMj79a8BzAaBuu2VIyYA3bE0O8ajorlrBomudMqNXgPeG9h5oCcMo7kMHkkBGqDnaMK0it9HwPdh sgr/iW6tCknsda/zu7Dy9ZMqRqi1vSVt3nld4nXDZ7oMVO2/Ld46WQXr2paSkgqWt24sc63edIEkT 2x+qgwiQ==;
Received: from msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de ([172.26.35.139] helo=msx.tu-dresden.de) by mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>) id 1wFv2Y-007ZIX-1z; Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:28:31 +0200
Received: from [10.12.5.228] (141.76.13.165) by msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.37; Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:28:14 +0200
Message-ID: <b7d550f3-76e9-4530-b681-85f4f7072e36@tu-dresden.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 16:28:13 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact>, Manu Fontaine <Manu@hushmesh.com>, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <0f2dd332-cda4-4950-83b2-25cbf276b548@tu-dresden.de> <F78785FF-B962-44E9-871E-053B9DD1DA96@gmail.com> <CAHu=PL2qys3-_b_T8vufDgtsGv4g7U4XmzHYZOt0OkU=qECcWg@mail.gmail.com> <b5d23a58-b075-4331-b2cc-b09a8a542276@ietf.contact>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
In-Reply-To: <b5d23a58-b075-4331-b2cc-b09a8a542276@ietf.contact>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms070701000403030106040409"
X-ClientProxiedBy: msx-t420.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.137) To msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.139)
X-TUD-Virus-Scanned: mailout7.zih.tu-dresden.de
Message-ID-Hash: S3EAOZF2H64Z6Q6JVNRQYRCSGSFBHJML
X-Message-ID-Hash: S3EAOZF2H64Z6Q6JVNRQYRCSGSFBHJML
X-MailFrom: muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rats.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rats@ietf.org, rats-chairs@ietf.org, draft-deshpande-rats-multi-verifier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Rats] Re: Call for adoption: draft-deshpande-rats-multi-verifier-04 (Ends 2026-04-24)
List-Id: Remote ATtestation procedureS <rats.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/AzNTuOOl8_5SKbeyetu_NhBMchM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rats-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rats-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rats-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Henk,

I would like to clarify once again that "consensus" is not the same as 
"rough consensus." I am disputing the authors repeatedly misusing the 
former in two meetings. Side meetings are not official part of IETF and 
consensus cannot be developed in a side meeting.

On 23.04.26 16:11, Henk Birkholz wrote:
> And decisions will be made via rough consensus on the list that is 
> then assessed by the chairs

And that's why I would like to kindly ask the authors not to use the 
term "consensus" in the presentations any more.

Best,

-Usama

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status