Re: [regext] status of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search

James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com> Mon, 03 October 2022 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <galvin@elistx.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2A3C1522D5 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=elistx-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IIVn_sfKEWrN for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf35.google.com (mail-qv1-xf35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D6ECC1522D4 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 05:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf35.google.com with SMTP id f14so3175719qvo.3 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 05:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elistx-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=vaA0hyJnfUNT1fGT+XIL3b0QdZHPF90py3JyAjCsV8g=; b=FAG2SJNBM6VrbPED88iparW8UeQXsqfj1Ss7o+XgLDZKlkUjTySchYufR4mFjJOMtd xcQjihIzv+D+L66ijkCwsayBAcb2Npop1p9F20uXipNxKFinVZTtMoFSSGhJMxydAfBs rQyleG0PC3J3nmfZMnxdR4vxZjBjMatdtg+U+J1Q2VzpGSKwQk654NdljBL/mVLZdsvk cYScEMg9voBu4q0wf5xScd3uPPqQ8TFqcd6+Cn16IJNYclsJrxCop2M0hdu0b35sSCPz mIREcI9rs1F8Rzp8Ut+xtKcuetC1h+1x2u3Nd8xgk/k+7/OYDq+T1Br9casmwAaORRmQ Nplw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=vaA0hyJnfUNT1fGT+XIL3b0QdZHPF90py3JyAjCsV8g=; b=el/o1TIEImuU9kymPUipB8BNuzDf6ZhSq8h4Se+EzI5yVZz+YI+rLabwg7g+Tr+sAR 3TzKcgsDOv2FlpI6JBN2nM7r+Zk7R53WsNIlCwi8/OyNoL32t/1Oe9ItDOpTD/0a09ZN eJR67ZqjfRpfXyuWmR4mrcSVa0I3aL2qBhqjBukIxdRu3y8sI9Yy4FFZa63Z2xqqDlAE Pjf5mheKN38AVjwDWFxTvbQab5FoyiB5Op3oo3B/Ca3hQr9Dai9+kNvx135tRAnm62YP Y5q98HaETVZ18fwLkds8nza5FmhujXfhPMk0/zpowWfX5WuT6G2DfhRL+BXSNdszv5xb MjWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1QxXPPA4K41JJyNUce2v+ta7xUKJQvqo8hZSU9njsduj/9TWwN ZdPAsvBDHpcCLv2LGRh6czqYdNPhLDxEaN6S
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM43XL+a40+GyX1rF1qZ4H5UiJ2aR9aKAdbuN/oCmYmk0lql6suD51gMbuoa1a9sEg1HXO6GPw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5181:b0:478:69bd:38c5 with SMTP id kl1-20020a056214518100b0047869bd38c5mr15777479qvb.59.1664801681557; Mon, 03 Oct 2022 05:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.99] ([2601:154:c200:3460:b838:7aa0:f170:482]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 132-20020a37038a000000b006ceb933a9fesm10919447qkd.81.2022.10.03.05.54.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Oct 2022 05:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>
To: Tom Harrison <tomh@apnic.net>
Cc: REGEXT WG <regext@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 08:54:44 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5853)
Message-ID: <B89EE813-0D7D-4729-8223-DADE9A3F0DED@elistx.com>
In-Reply-To: <8572B6C4-6DEF-4A84-9E80-33CCD4954398@elistx.com>
References: <DE3DF65A-F1DE-4B7F-A30A-C4DF19FE604D@elistx.com> <YxAEaHIhZWxhqPeP@TomH-802418> <8572B6C4-6DEF-4A84-9E80-33CCD4954398@elistx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/3eUgYcy3_Jf5FqVEzYQltNlkjwc>
Subject: Re: [regext] status of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 12:54:47 -0000

Sorry.  Ignore this message.  I got my documents confused.  :-)

Jim



On 3 Oct 2022, at 8:51, James Galvin wrote:

> Thanks Tom.
>
> In addition to your own feedback, as the document shepherd the Chairs need you to confirm that all other feedback discussed on the list has been addressed in the latest version of the document.
>
> With that confirmation, as soon as WGLC closes for the opendID document the Chairs will move this document forward.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim
>
>
> On 31 Aug 2022, at 21:01, Tom Harrison wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 09:45:11AM -0400, James Galvin wrote:
>>> Mario Loffredo has asked for WGLC for the RDAP reverse search
>>> document:
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/
>>>
>>> This document had a WGLC about 6 months ago that resulted in quite
>>> some extended discussion, and as a result it did not pass WGLC.
>>>
>>> Mario has produced a revised document but there has not been any
>>> discussion on the list about these changes.
>>>
>>> The Chairs would like for those who had concerns the last time to
>>> indicate on the list that their concerns have been addressed before
>>> we start another WGLC on this document.
>>>
>>> Please, if you had questions last time, indicate if your questions
>>> have been answered in the latest version of the document.
>>>
>>> The Chairs must see this before we can start a WGLC.
>>
>> My feedback has been addressed.
>>
>> -Tom