Re: [regext] status of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search

[James Galvin <[e-mail]>]

Sorry.  Ignore this message.  I got my documents confused.  :-)

Jim



On 3 Oct 2022, at 8:51, James Galvin wrote:

> Thanks Tom.
>
> In addition to your own feedback, as the document shepherd the Chairs need you to confirm that all other feedback discussed on the list has been addressed in the latest version of the document.
>
> With that confirmation, as soon as WGLC closes for the opendID document the Chairs will move this document forward.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim
>
>
> On 31 Aug 2022, at 21:01, Tom Harrison wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 09:45:11AM -0400, James Galvin wrote:
>>> Mario Loffredo has asked for WGLC for the RDAP reverse search
>>> document:
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/
>>>
>>> This document had a WGLC about 6 months ago that resulted in quite
>>> some extended discussion, and as a result it did not pass WGLC.
>>>
>>> Mario has produced a revised document but there has not been any
>>> discussion on the list about these changes.
>>>
>>> The Chairs would like for those who had concerns the last time to
>>> indicate on the list that their concerns have been addressed before
>>> we start another WGLC on this document.
>>>
>>> Please, if you had questions last time, indicate if your questions
>>> have been answered in the latest version of the document.
>>>
>>> The Chairs must see this before we can start a WGLC.
>>
>> My feedback has been addressed.
>>
>> -Tom