Re: [regext] status of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Mon, 29 August 2022 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B9EC1527A9 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YEm33lmWvF31 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.verisign.com (mail2.verisign.com [72.13.63.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6DE8C152718 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=1663; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1661789760; h=from:to:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=7rNmXFriD5GciTAJPF8taokXQgK1g5zq3cD6vpwSKmk=; b=ps7nOTGLK4ItJkrQTA+ZfMJnbI9f9xokCyuV/02wqifS6pDx0fqU1O23 RgzQvD/kLRSJb+MKmxzcka/29NxM9RAfm/7ip/M/K1Y/s4lg7sh3D541N 5ENC7u2fSMCJoC51kQZwJX2zsV2/oa4ClfPP3WBuGjY9V7jXpUNuN+fFr GEKREWovxFHbBmeA9aX5uf+5Y840XIUeOHZekl4mIm3wzezEhQf22Mc/Z F1ZVlAxHhzB+dMhDMn9mlInldo7XxHDVCpn4LpoyPMSbdbWr+IrAmlgpi hEtRnF2KoV4RRGhSulcfbhq1A02yRDts2BctfQCSzERZRF4Z5kxhjqrXr Q==;
IronPort-Data: A9a23:+KJbsqPAk8nz6Y7vrR3KlsFynXyQoLVcMsEvi/4bfWQNrUpzgTYOm 2dMDTqPaavZa2T9e411b4zk808Bu8WHndBiTQZtpSBmQkwRpJueD7x1DKtS0wC6dZSfER09v 63yTvGacajYm1eF/k/F3oDJ9CU6j+fQLlbFILasEjhrQgN5QzsWhxtmmuoo6qZlmtHR7zml4 LsemOWCfg7+s9JIGjhMsfjb+Ek+5K2aVA4w5TTSW9ga5DcyqFFIVPrzFYnpR1PkT49dGPKNR uqr5NlVKUuAon/Bovv8+lrKWhViroz6ZGBiuVIPM0SWuSWukwRpukoNHKFFNRoI0WXhc+dZk 72hvbToIesgFvOUxLRFC3G0GQkmVUFN0OevzXRSLaV/ZqAJGpfh66wGMa04AWEX0stPDVNo2 vVHEh42VzSsocyfyaz8GvY506zPLOGzVG8eklta62jmK9sWGcqFXa7N/8ce1Tt2mNpVG7DVY M9xhThHNUyGOkIUfA5KU9RizY9EhVGmG9FcgEmVoq4z7m7ZwQdy+KbgKtvOe9OMA85Smy50o 0qfoTqiXkBAabRzzxKKyWmw2r+UmR/xAqdDOJPi8sZp2lyqkzl75Bo+EAHTTeOCokG3X8xeL WQZ/is1sbh0/0uuJvHnUhK1sGKsvxMAVZxXCeJS1e2W4qDO5V+GAGUUFmQEc8I88so3Xnkg0 RmDhdWwQyJ1q7vTQnWYnluJkQ6P1eEuBTdqTUc5ocEturEPfKlbYsrzc+te
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:eXoIC6kzCrlSrfOVLx+v2ybhwrbpDfIH3DAbv31ZSRFFG/Fwz/ re+cjzpiWE7Ar5P0tQ4uxoWZPwOU80mqQV3WB8B92ftUzdyQmVxeJZnPHfKl/bexEWn9Q1vc xdmupFeb7N5DNB4foSlTPXLz9W+ra6Gc6T6Ns2hE0dKj2CI5sQiTuRJDzra3FLeA==
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,272,1654560000"; d="scan'208";a="16634925"
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2375.31; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:15:57 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.49]) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.173.153.49]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.031; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:15:57 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "galvin@elistx.com" <galvin@elistx.com>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] [regext] status of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
Thread-Index: AQHYu62uhj/7NEzLL0au/JUFn4DgX63GDX3Q
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:15:57 +0000
Message-ID: <9068d9fa984a4eb6a5308aab060ecf08@verisign.com>
References: <DE3DF65A-F1DE-4B7F-A30A-C4DF19FE604D@elistx.com>
In-Reply-To: <DE3DF65A-F1DE-4B7F-A30A-C4DF19FE604D@elistx.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/LHrZmYG12WOBOf6zoS4F7fOiBaY>
Subject: Re: [regext] status of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:16:03 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: regext <regext-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of James Galvin
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 9:45 AM
> To: REGEXT WG <regext@ietf.org>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] status of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
> Mario Loffredo has asked for WGLC for the RDAP reverse search document:
>
> https://secure-
> web.cisco.com/1qJplb0OfSltXyBovza2Ful3_FsckvMvRidgmREHfGw4D1gI9xMwC
> HhKtqertKXdsiY5O-z1kZXS0RAyFWFHlT1Y9PQS9V3kSdQshO89dIRTps9dj_-
> yolbV3PHOdltwC5bq0SUTUgeg3qJ9u_VYgxJ_ULti6CL35e45AUSnuEV__DbVl6rG2
> MEQTGFWHls86iFQxxFNdmuj73l4LhKuBUOHYotPxS05boHm2jaR_PbKOLq8GCtL
> OSaqsntbGTSP-/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-
> regext-rdap-reverse-search%2F
>
> This document had a WGLC about 6 months ago that resulted in quite some
> extended discussion, and as a result it did not pass WGLC.
>
> Mario has produced a revised document but there has not been any discussion
> on the list about these changes.
>
> The Chairs would like for those who had concerns the last time to indicate on
> the list that their concerns have been addressed before we start another WGLC
> on this document.
>
> Please, if you had questions last time, indicate if your questions have been
> answered in the latest version of the document.

[SAH] My feedback, which is described here:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/NbWDkBcgAVJz28k2FbPnzRD5L_c/

has been addressed.

Scott