IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-00.txt

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Tue, 13 February 2018 12:16 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEBB1241F5 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 04:16:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yCQGJTyS_zNC for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 04:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.verisign.com (mail3.verisign.com [72.13.63.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B87D6124319 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 04:16:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=1105; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1518524216; h=from:to:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=5i7eWffvXegn+uUtCNVvrAWzJtNRewKe7CP44gJH/0I=; b=EMRKNyu98BJCa1S00JOoKujdA2Q1Ufa0ddmwsSCaFJ8+nNyMZqflURbR BH34fC/ggcZH9Y5Qw+ufYylYQakfxM6Ig12g1OTRcHFLvJZOGSYT8WKkp FUolmhW2qvOdYKvMd/xNa4rzPv+lyZw06XMT3UEX03ZrKsX4eRf8a82IZ OJ3R4ARi9S7Vcr+OWrwJr1fqwEh28uLuZCTzVNzfCSWmIuZe/SpWdKYjf LaLVt6T+lmAzi7qKJUf/86feoPzMYchsY/Wut81NsIyqg0Xr63N+c9UEV NM4MTwD6sliWexjqlJm+xp0+PqrKVaTZwr70p1WUUt3z7TSCob28/qZ2k A==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,507,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="3850380"
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23: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
X-IPAS-Result: A2FuAQBi1oJa//SZrQpcGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYVQCp4nEYEGgjOWJgqFOwKDOxQBAgEBAQEBAQIBAoEQgjgigkoBAQEBAzpLBAIBCA0EBAEBAQoUCQcyFAkIAgQBEgi9E4h/ghEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBH4UBg22BZ4MuhQwYg0aCNAWkLgMGAqpGl2sCBAsCGQGBPDaBc3BSgkaDCoFteIpzgRcBAQE
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01 [10.173.152.205]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w1DCGsXX011134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 07:16:54 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 07:16:53 -0500
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "'pm@dotandco.com'" <pm@dotandco.com>, "'regext@ietf.org'" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTpI+Q8kZBjdUhqEGuSWrZZd5Fq6OiPx3g
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:16:53 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F7F966BD3@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <151611059420.11978.12868867445240964392@ietfa.amsl.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F7F965777@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <1518501456.1024138.1268914816.2D2CC6DA@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1518501456.1024138.1268914816.2D2CC6DA@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/Gi-uDoI3DMMbGk9Xx0-ZMy7ordU>
Subject: Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-00.txt
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:16:57 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: regext [mailto:regext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 12:58 AM
> To: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-
> object-tag-00.txt
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018, at 15:29, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>
> > There's been no comment on this document in the month since it was
> > noted on this list. Does anyone have anything to say about the
> > proposed practice?
>
> I have not specifically commented this version, but all my old comments
> apply to it the same way and the previous thread ended with clear
> positions on both side so I do not think there is anything to rehash.
>
> In short,
> I am happy if current practice is documented, as such.
> (It would however have been great seeing more support from other RDAP
> server operators)

Agreed, which is why I'm trying to get some discussion going. Folks, if you're either running an RDAP service or planning to do so in the future it would be very helpful to talk through this proposal.

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email