IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-00.txt

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> Mon, 12 February 2018 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4E612D872 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:34:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YYUqrvMB-XwR for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:34:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22d.google.com (mail-wr0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEAC7126DC2 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:34:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id q11so4882178wre.8 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:34:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :subject:to:from:message-id; bh=FqD2Wt493blT+hPbU1ohZCInfofRUIFo40n1Z8e0IDw=; b=dHMKY+uJwIjb7mrJXGY7bwatPx901e+YN/OyGEvFZLPkJ41CC5MaZudfrWJzKmfp6L +N+E3+wVsfo6xGNsFEH6QkceD1blKAigJ5p70xY5AjxBUPD8kSJtPZimCBI+poUrY9yA NxIgtIgA5UFmDYHI1pEc1HsSn1ZA5BDunZNnJLsoIHBll4QcMjJJPqcWnQ3W3uPjDiJF e5BMrpW9o07mcEKiQW7HCRpwqrrzGYYwMfOB0zHSRVXK30Cyei33ai3uSIvrtL9Tq6LI djzLyw81dNGGlA//3SL/YtLF9dhYqcN/aV31iw91gMmzrOlVf1c8WXnop3FWV4G/gY5j 55LA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; bh=FqD2Wt493blT+hPbU1ohZCInfofRUIFo40n1Z8e0IDw=; b=o6b7OqFyOWQ1vYOe2O8kmovcpXVhg4AKTxCquds2q4gEB2W66zdz8sMCILTMj8j8N1 yFTAKlecM+90Ir2ZgEAB/IPouu9y8dMRVRxwza8UB89cTfJPhpU/VVBgMg0F4yA0ZraY KHtifepUxxvhBIpch9ESi8iE3LPiUzNI87paApG5s/19AyVjzPSEzjiFfsXEF9yo1c9j aytrgGoevgGWR8w+xnMZalZ7SVdepxD5G5EViKARQzEHFs2BL4IPx9fgNmBJFdh159Gy edok/H68TyTP0RaAkxj7txnpvmDmVQWE5JnBqe0KAnLwhlHuBSYcDi/ZKkmi60VS1AFK 6cTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCA1vOAEL5eYlUIoCNaH3zOsAofPrjmJeu+Ou3GoK2zFoo0hzYJ Y7ixaCgC5YWjMbrDiISMI55LSvZa
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226Izm0KnccO/MDbrFcXuSzA5ViOvHcRkBLcYmJcisUIbAOhRt0fLGz9v0UJV7Ov8uuEOh/FVQ==
X-Received: by 10.223.186.198 with SMTP id w6mr10263354wrg.172.1518471286971; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [100.112.176.87] (213-225-32-110.nat.highway.a1.net. [213.225.32.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v5sm6301438wmb.19.2018.02.12.13.34.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 22:34:39 +0100
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F7F965777@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <151611059420.11978.12868867445240964392@ietfa.amsl.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F7F965777@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: regext@ietf.org, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'regext@ietf.org'" <regext@ietf.org>
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52B96365-DA47-48BE-BE48-E7DC77854D9F@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/jBE-IozxsUlt6XHRsHZax-6jUXo>
Subject: Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-00.txt
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 21:34:51 -0000

On 12 February 2018 15:29:02 CET, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: regext [mailto:regext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-
>> drafts@ietf.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 8:50 AM
>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>> Cc: regext@ietf.org
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] I-D Action:
>draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-
>> tag-00.txt
>>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG
>of
>> the IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
>Object
>> Tagging
>>         Authors         : Scott Hollenbeck
>>                           Andrew Lee Newton
>>       Filename        : draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-00.txt
>>       Pages           : 12
>>       Date            : 2018-01-16
>
>There's been no comment on this document in the month since it was
>noted on this list. Does anyone have anything to say about the proposed
>practice?

Isn't a separate tag registry redundant wrt the existing ROID-suffix registry? 

thanks,

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email