IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-00.txt

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Wed, 14 February 2018 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C2012D7F4 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:48:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hxr-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O_b_-UuRHoq7 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:48:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 797E7124205 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:48:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id e1so16320994ita.0 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:48:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hxr-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EIMPAeDqxd2RsvO9sAbZKkiqbRyUC0AkGO93r75CI1s=; b=cxiqTnvggIdFqrUXFbSoksxElgM7oJZ1OWDEn4I823Era6QNJuN/M6PL/P1huvFTKE G7yHuC3ekBkH4jytBHtwwW+GpEDtJn3EymVwHIPyn2XmC0BZcdY9TF0z3ra0UhoaeYfB X0t7K77nmT6QqstIr1RYZkWfKzqYMTGBpBRUs/MiALcO8r81iqPhB//EclzERWCvOXPI H/0AzTz/6SmdRmZtkQVNjYWf290o5u46DjI0kbyMGTM6Nqdcog+nAoRoVvoi8jIypmLx lpRabR2RGPTX7hgrgMBM+yzqd8OKUnhho7Kwb3L4ptvxFoY9n0w98lPV0jGlLC4rmcsA pJwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EIMPAeDqxd2RsvO9sAbZKkiqbRyUC0AkGO93r75CI1s=; b=PlpF+gVShboKbA7fyZobfyLVwbmpiJloO4HHaWa4YgJRwW5lZ3XS9Z0quGp5KeGEUX 1E1ABpFvNCmvWjqYMrnE+FShr77X7bCdRl7jYpjaLdPNIzw3GrDkpKpuQ4qCYdYPFCkC u3AgV3/WC9XBvlgeLSqrkwHdC/7J3pvIXehHMNKPbA0KaGFCmAjrdwtSrr/YYlsZ76T/ ZHfprVWxLQjmEtVg865Mh5S3uCojKCZ5f5vSHhXSlqjqcKhvga0WHwVYGgxNlvNH/LSx xJf54Mh3zHiwbZp4BILx90XcBcF8uEws3MDVisMhW6gI8IQMUFgEAy/otOt9oavOMz3x GVgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDclstJMOOwaN3KLQ6dLlwjFyeqhnB1Luqs8j3I3nJVe0vAR06b 9LzpiFHP9tvTe/QTH1X8Rne73z0GjZNZpGIhLBsHAw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2263TbNvOZPMS5X8h4wm26BzM0MBoSYq0BwdT5N4SRq8s+OG3AzlGU6FB218qZw2caspztuObVWq7nRNcLZCXmk=
X-Received: by 10.36.34.139 with SMTP id o133mr166363ito.82.1518637689786; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:48:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.200.203 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:48:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [203.47.88.82]
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F7F966BD3@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <151611059420.11978.12868867445240964392@ietfa.amsl.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F7F965777@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <1518501456.1024138.1268914816.2D2CC6DA@webmail.messagingengine.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F7F966BD3@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:48:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRdAo7ahENnHaWbcPS0RjN+NLi0+ZBndjhk+YfbG0r8h=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc: "pm@dotandco.com" <pm@dotandco.com>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/o6iZbalqya7-0ZhafarjW7pFWEU>
Subject: Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-00.txt
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 19:48:12 -0000

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott
<shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote:
>
> Agreed, which is why I'm trying to get some discussion going. Folks, if you're either running an RDAP service or planning to do so in the future it would be very helpful to talk through this proposal.

Well, we discussed this in Chicago and there seemed to be pretty good
feedback. As both an operator and a client author I like this idea
(even if I'm not wild about the tilde character). Having a standard
short cut to say "this is meant for the XXX registry" would be
beneficial to clients, even if server operators don't actually append
the tags to their objects. I've thought about cludging something
together for NicInfo using the existing IANA .json files, but having a
formal registry would be much better.

-andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email