[regext] Ideas to address the privacy implication of reverse search draft

Ali Hussain <ali.hussain@siswa.um.edu.my> Thu, 03 December 2020 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ali.hussain@siswa.um.edu.my>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECA63A0B54 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 00:48:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.1
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24=3.199, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=siswa.um.edu.my
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YjQJtWiHN3HL for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 00:48:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb33.google.com (mail-yb1-xb33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1995F3A0B38 for <regext@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 00:48:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb33.google.com with SMTP id k65so1327737ybk.5 for <regext@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:48:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siswa.um.edu.my; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=F0KUgf+3bYYAdvpk4L8YbdzOQAEshsxjGRpNa45d2Z0=; b=UTbLZ7aFF7y34ajepzKDQmvoELz0qtM6/Z0fmCqGXLbWRu04lsRCt8BlMLwt5Y2ekU Lgmep8yPQ86ZXzkTYxzIJl8fQpzROQEZfIhfuVz7BrMFYfynN5kDQ6EnW1Fc/ov3lCvV 1uH0LcZGvHTLZAxHGfpCFXe9A1G2xIFAPBJL82wyhkjrWzSfVgqSWrqThQ4zLvqdPQXK S0B3pi54vwqAjEK1POT8GqEXFtPOMasdhmHXyHknX7gqhBKY34SAL2/YmitOE24YZLzE oWlSYhsv1hJv/vly2UZ3XNbhW+dwoWL4+E/RA48WgRBOHdBQZ/BlOOKO9+Q9wCbDba+D 5Rvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=F0KUgf+3bYYAdvpk4L8YbdzOQAEshsxjGRpNa45d2Z0=; b=Y1U1OXysRT/TE5ghUnDfTuEmu9HlYg9VyAkPVCgn8m34dTLPz1Dt0B7Rf3yXllxa3+ GMhu1mwQRHScSBjwhjO30KBiOZCPtghv+0p4NBdrbipjoDku+fAVj2WQT7lxEY9QTu+n enQ0bWbWjue8eq5VJ6lwfhUPc3fc1W0TCjkqIoW/a0ASmae6EJG9FuzxhnGNiRxSlLBQ wRGKrHx18d/U1a/4y9nQiAtWJM6XA2mf/s+Jfb5G4LbHHzh9pLbnzjp2ArDPN7bs6w9L DU977F5pvIjwpj4QB+W4dREOFHEjhIaAtMW6VO9XVoD7uptKCUjG7UKeq/cIui5n0Lpw PXvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530A8O9EJoHUPa9jDv2+yzdp/QFufjFX7JGjDf1UBmD8ySRivGpJ A9GfA60D4+AYRM2Iqhcy+aVFf1ZAHs5DbkqGOs4Dim5IAcJQVg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeZHKXQntB9MCI2dPUph+yVQnuf48f9J/WBXB2w4f4X/YN73jwaABqcODXxj3jtOzfgd6Tr9ZiFZt9l/zs/yM=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:905:: with SMTP id 5mr3130257ybj.44.1606985293654; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:48:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ali Hussain <ali.hussain@siswa.um.edu.my>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 16:47:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFwa7wesYFhA7hQMAWNBy_SRWPn6WzggLHAiC1ZtpDvK+=yeRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: regext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009685d705b58b6bea"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/TKgrLuLF5FjDI7dzsoyFyO2yc48>
Subject: [regext] Ideas to address the privacy implication of reverse search draft
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 08:48:17 -0000

Hi All,

It wa  interesting to see the interest during REGEXT IETF 109 meeting call
to address the the privacy aspects of draft
(draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search).


So far my idea to improve the reverse search to first make the JSON object
for the required level of privacy critical data. Based on the tag the
partial response suppresses the privacy part of responses by encoding and
in order to decode it, it must present an identity to federated access
control.

I am also reviewing the hrpc draft to bring some valuable input form their
guidance.

Please let me know what you think and is anyone else interested to work on
this?

Thanks,

Regards,
Ali Hussain