[regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-25: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-25: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Tero Kivinen for the SECDIR review.

Thanks for address my DISCUSS feedback.

I support Lars Eggert's DISCUSS position.

==

** Section 1.
   The first objection concerns the potential risks of privacy
   violation.

Where are these privacy concerns summarized?  Could a reference be provided?