IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [renum] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 21 December 2012 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: renum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E0921F85ED for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:59:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.085, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YMPTyxpC0KkQ for <renum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1248921F85E8 for <renum@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:59:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id u54so2265068wey.27 for <renum@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:59:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TXqwCN942I7Qu5FMGFNE1eH4sVlmb5RZxjazKahzcB0=; b=h940K846aEek997SPhC1Kl/wL/QDIh2Y1VyjaaoTXzaPXU8+nTJ3mAGl/SYEd4LQW6 4Tmh56iIG+o6TMaW3vYeKzz4nVzeZ8QRU5fgU3AxA6pdA5C2TW2tp0/opZnFbvJz6EIS QGYj/7IDrrkW+QErFzCUCju2abkX9WNJhnhDdnZ6wqKRgTRFM2i/OgrAb76J23XY5FSB ar09qQ6EZ8ZBkHAlJXNKzHBdQleyaI7CyTmhbk6lYdvhP+QEsaKHCIz8+49aQuN4+Wqd iSSmn23UKPLHZ3R/XszO082tR0FouiA77mXB2bGZfgNMjlct8az8JqyXsXWxITuK4aO6 pZVA==
X-Received: by 10.181.13.75 with SMTP id ew11mr23692878wid.9.1356101992074; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:59:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-102-219-97.as13285.net. [2.102.219.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hg17sm30154416wib.1.2012.12.21.06.59.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 06:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50D47975.7000002@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:00:05 +0000
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
References: <20121221085701.6227.80317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50D46A01.4000903@gmail.com> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033A5253EE@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com>
In-Reply-To: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033A5253EE@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "renum@ietf.org" <renum@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [renum] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05.txt
X-BeenThere: renum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Renumbering discussion mailing list." <renum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/renum>
List-Post: <mailto:renum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/renum>, <mailto:renum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:59:54 -0000

Wes,

On 21/12/2012 14:42, George, Wes wrote:
>> From: renum-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:renum-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> 
>> Benoit Claise's review - clarified scope, then
>>
>>  "Section 1, paragraph 1
>>
>>    However, widespread use of PI might
>>    create serious BGP4 scaling problems
>>
>>  A reference, or a small explanation, would be welcome "
>>
>> It's unfortunate that the RRG did not produce an RFC on BGP scaling
>> problems.
> [WEG] They didn't? While RRG didn't come to consensus on a *solution*, there was consensus documented about several aspects of the problem space that should serve as the necessary level of background reading to support this assertion.

Personally I wish that draft-narten-radir-problem-statement had
become an RFC. The published RRG documents say rather little about
the root causes of the scaling problem.

>> We can refer to RFC 4116 but it isn't ideal.
> [WEG]
> You may find better reference points in RFC4984, 6227, or even 6115.

I think that 6227 is the best of those for this purpose.

Thanks
    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email