IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rfc-i] Re: Normative information in RFC imagery

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 14 May 2025 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A816928A5504 for <rfc-interest@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FyvMqytrSh80 for <rfc-interest@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fossa.ash.relay.mailchannels.net (fossa.ash.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.222.62]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9A0428A54FF for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83823183346; Wed, 14 May 2025 21:08:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a229.dreamhost.com (trex-green-2.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.112.106.147]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 13581184CD8; Wed, 14 May 2025 21:08:07 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1747256887; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Nupsyn8Jv6hicUajaKCiAZhDBJvLqN6p1fZb7DmW9m7J6E4YmJMFMm78pU6l32VpAU0dGZ 7in3yx77E3PXX+zcuE7XsC95QxYXowyTx+RuaUHt34U5LG0fcXqqe1bjBtLRNWodUGdesH w8jhBMmVx0U40ZLs62ni0EhTQ56DGJoBkuYY0VtquZbHxGzZjCipXxENxdEQ8+iPFukWTa 3EG0QFjtxEEZReRA00FHvaRvBSJUbCnyRxxZxTvp8Wkds4YdWuEcL4ClKWHkTBS9qjOKf1 S9kVY8F696WW4I5N03SITZy4LFrijmzDgfKDt48tymkfl8eALdWRhPI+XQ1OQA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1747256887; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=DDRQTcnTb8eoiqD6lSqdCllbV0Jq7U2r4bRJ6KDCoTQ=; b=OvcPve8qkB+z3rWMtofifFYN27+qetRFptizHOXDxTN+pBxm3EcnVOfYCLRfgKVh7FIvyk +FW9+LTTwCBelPBqzet0Vo6KnCeRzwqTEx4u2BD2i1evIpR0/b/6nEkLCKX/g3roSg4tTQ TPGbJP/m9T1026M4ITL4BJZYVcyGFfQRdrQvkmE8UCeaWBBYeKSKkImR6Mb5ggzGBV52ia Sp5A/dm4meTWkm1bOLgWeWcbs1alr7ORQYUMr3yhklyMLgBgmpV3j5AAf0cAB8un0GMzuB 9yyXLumKr4vkksmOsklxIhJKUeZ5V8pkIaTw9d0cCeRjBW59hR47w1HlKp3OQw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-5dcf5fb4c6-s28n8; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=nico@cryptonector.com
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Ski-Vacuous: 03d5149d154fb070_1747256887310_3168290944
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1747256887310:2335849089
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1747256887310
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a229.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.112.106.147 (trex/7.0.3); Wed, 14 May 2025 21:08:07 +0000
Received: from ubby (syn-075-081-095-064.res.spectrum.com [75.81.95.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a229.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZyQsy2Z88z6t; Wed, 14 May 2025 14:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; s=dreamhost; t=1747256886; bh=DDRQTcnTb8eoiqD6lSqdCllbV0Jq7U2r4bRJ6KDCoTQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Content-Type; b=DT6zdi4TYOEoTusOIruWTdCn5xWQ3V3yuA52M0NDlnIRQUkdFFpgYK0hnYAdNNhRR mEOE6MQ3luo8Y/L2l1cYMbUlBELiCSqo53a8LV+6a8olnmarFEOIfYxZa52hgv0ZU/ zyBHKHIMAo2VSR90fNN3QRceDLLLiQ1QMyXw0fxI73x+Ah1FuxBpkMAv+zqak0dxlt nuKzZ/vTbeWNE+EhBFBllVRJmwyT984HfwjGItuihzNXR7iDsT+rUrcpZWcLAmy9Ch +fEB/TnEpsKPlIFrotTJBKGwLPkH7nPKURE7FB7KSodCFVvfC8TOV5U3zcduD8RQLW C7aWpLFg9s43w==
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 16:08:04 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Alexis Rossi <alexisrossirsce@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <aCUGNEC86mWBPx5R@ubby>
References: <CALLfFGPtFPZh2onghyiiurH0QBOUmde7Xck66+0tv7-OF07QgA@mail.gmail.com> <aCPYogBubUuPGjfI@ubby> <1926430.1747213560@dyas> <CALLfFGM2VsN19OGV0nRaKwgzx0aSpejF1G8Gf3i5D2BrBZgmAA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALLfFGM2VsN19OGV0nRaKwgzx0aSpejF1G8Gf3i5D2BrBZgmAA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID-Hash: 4PHOTJRL4R4RTLDCUYCPPTBMZDPOZQ75
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4PHOTJRL4R4RTLDCUYCPPTBMZDPOZQ75
X-MailFrom: nico@cryptonector.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [rfc-i] Re: Normative information in RFC imagery
List-Id: "A general discussion list about the RFC Series and its operational processes." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/0Y_NTHP5NTgBS1lw6bEEVGXxf0E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rfc-interest-owner@rfc-editor.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rfc-interest-join@rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rfc-interest-leave@rfc-editor.org>

On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 01:48:45PM -0700, Alexis Rossi wrote:
> While doing a little exploring about UML and PlantUML yesterday, I noticed
> that draw.io is phasing out PlantUML support at the end of the year in
> favor of mermaid.js. I don't know what that means about its longevity, but
> thought I should note it.
> https://github.com/jgraph/drawio/discussions/5074

PlantUML is pretty crappy, but I can parse it.  Mermaid is better.  I've
used both.  I agree that Mermaid is the future.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status