[rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and the RFC Editor's tracker
sginoza at amsl.com (Sandy Ginoza) Mon, 12 July 2010 18:34 UTC
From: "sginoza at amsl.com"
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:34:25 -0700
Subject: [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and the RFC Editor's tracker
In-Reply-To: <01F62BF9-671B-4F66-98DF-B065F5924696@amsl.com>
References: <01F62BF9-671B-4F66-98DF-B065F5924696@amsl.com>
Message-ID: <1A102ED7-6F22-444D-8A08-5CBD733CBC34@amsl.com>
Greetings, On Jul 12, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Sandy Ginoza wrote: >> This message is not to discuss what those states should be; if you are interested in that, please see: >> >> - <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-juskevicius-datatracker-wgdocstate-reqts> and <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states> for the IETF stream; these two documents are in IETF Last Call >> >> - <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoffman-alt-streams-tracker> for the IAB, ISE, and IRTF streams >> >> Both Ed and I quite interested in more input on the documents. > Thank you for the pointer. We will send comments on draft-hoffman-alt-streams-tracker in a separate message. We see that the following definitions for when a document is passed to the RFC Editor for publication: IAB o Sent to the RFC Editor -- The IAB processing of this document is complete and it has been sent to the RFC Editor for publication. The document may be in the RFC Editor's queue, or it may have been published as an RFC; this state doesn't distinguish between different states occurring after the document has left the IAB. IRTF o Submitted IRTF Document The document has been submitted for publication (and not returned to the IRTF for further action). The document may be in the RFC Editor's queue, or it may have been published as an RFC; this state doesn't distinguish between different states occurring after the document has left the IRTF. IS o Sent to the RFC Production Center -- The ISE processing of this document is complete and it has been sent to the RFC Production Center for publication. The document may be in the RFC Editor's queue, or it may have been published as an RFC; this state doesn't distinguish between different states occurring after the document has left the ISE. - We suggest that this state name be consistent across the streams, for example "Sent to the RFC Production Center." - After publication, why wouldn't the tracker show its Status as an RFC as it does currently (e.g., "RFC 5766 (Proposed Standard)")? - Is the tracker intended to be one continuous tracker for I-Ds (I-D posting --> WG approval --> IESG review/approval --> RFC submission) or is there a separation between the WG tracker and IESG tracker? Thanks, Sandy Ginoza, Director RFC Production Center Association Management Solutions, LLC 48377 Fremont Blvd, Ste #117 / Fremont, CA 94538 / USA Telephone: +1.510.492.4000, Fax: +1.510.492.4001 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20100712/89d6d63b/attachment.htm>
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Joel M. Halpern
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Brian E Carpenter
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Ray Pelletier
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Dave CROCKER
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Dave CROCKER
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Bob Hinden
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Glenn Kowack
- [rfc-i] Fwd: Future interaction of the Datatracke… Glenn Kowack
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Sandy Ginoza
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Sandy Ginoza
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Paul Hoffman
- [rfc-i] Future interaction of the Datatracker and… Ed Juskevicius