IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Citing internet drafts

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 06 September 2019 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E481200E9 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bMvwVtfkNWtD for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4788120026 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C19B8140F; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C719CB8140F; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QOAEvFehOVXi; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0954B8140E; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1567785223; bh=Ilrb4vBqPXDuxgm8AaYZkmHWf0isbX5hAuHxCmnH08g=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=FIYt5rbNzqDY3i1nv+Dv2L/DYn9sG1+vZyhntBG8qI+HbLaSuhhUCKuOuQ/TshXQD qjeeignoszXjHoRgklEzXwUZhGUjg3LTW/7ggTVRKw4Ebiar61APSigFVSRgouImOl cxCqxZmV4Zh5e38qg0mfKvyuQwV0rStcdw9r8t3s=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([93.203.248.179]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MrQEx-1iT0fA2sf1-00oa2b; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 17:53:43 +0200
To: Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>
References: <9dca07bd-293c-7f1e-0cbc-c0a9907d09c2@gmx.de> <5377138d-4ab4-1994-77ad-10ee719f8096@gmx.de> <A8375893-8F99-4092-88C1-2ECC459F5846@rfc-editor.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <924f81cf-6742-a34d-1cba-06d52f0e1862@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 17:53:42 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A8375893-8F99-4092-88C1-2ECC459F5846@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:PhpKa9iafa/7i54DCtdag6EJXcG4GeYPI7ttiRmKKANwWMQmbrA cTb2D/TT0VLQj/cnhEnboNoOCMvSUK7lEVlYKBFr1sqIjC2UrhP+uuqyoDbR0/BTymEsPbi EAzpgIT70v7Zg1zYJjJqYheYXVif2NskRUSyiXHmsJ6IVC5fAO/vDv4wLsS45YXbxq7tONU n/9+D/+jUD3j+rB71Z2Dw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:7d0trnrGB7A=:7b+78Niwp6jfamqwN9/cIE IXbUmqtEufm6PJWHwM5uNMw/nc5ZxkgKSTb2rNaeE4oZ4GfEZMmfx1+m3IfIfuhlye0zX6F+o gYnWZC/JjAblIyl4lGibV6MGQoYa7Qj6zmXC/QqoV4m4wTSOWjMmXJPhzagAWd+CmeZPeutYx Ejxj/qEt8DIwu+dquUeby/AuH9E7+hExBnN+V7abohON+L0iZ24ay0/fMTPSnC9nM/D6Tqh18 uJf9TFOcv6eyUWpjq57T8mhghPI3NcMULw/w//+FWOBXMci9cl8+y0TABLluImhnZN8StDpNv wm9RULDyQ5wVwgS/tOFUjdmWgleb8ixSzqGq1eekvwvjPoyi4DGVGuSJbYag4E3jyNJEHsjvv uWcBRujYq5ydJCBC8qZxja+JznMrl89J9knmlFE28rIanPAijkh4S+/TL8oTrJrfuLI8k25sl LB6XqosO/CrZCsmkX2VH5SAL+X4lHcP4MHaWFaPNee7kroMzJlxgPvmCHelAdXOgDl6eixMcA 6Qfw/EINOsWWKajQ7r4E3XpO4QiZpiFhhUDfy7G9+XwLBKZeO0dSaMVZvMv9oL0aijtUA9zjh aVrHuiAMusxfaVfX30/zcMAH0DMAshHuTZm9YX+fYA0xjZPQZ7Xs6rp/gxN6X2UKVUWYTpy7l hQa/Pi/SPCgdoAW2/5mwjvlbGIbffGcMcKKTets0UMZwbURLjN8onzVXlDGn2BixXmWBfzLHa 0TUIfgW4bFKVwyRO9wessgU+9r06Snxx4IPHIbkO9hwWniewXRWr0H5kwtvpnEnuHvRu+471C b5wr6OeDbN/yBxohkZphNCn/Zwv+rzPMyir9baQ9iLYrInMtON01r5NLA9Iu6q2EdTmqe1YBE 3kxHU1ESTZC8CMim5xtBmMdabVuWCpNqSzgqRToQjEBRbtU2SqqlHeiKvperTLM/vEwcz5NVm OlGdR86lCIN6+ndN/zn0thPIsy48kiwuT7ypIJK9VDU3B+CiyNlNzAvP8erArO0RLfjM+rmSM rTRlpkjYT38G1PvBVPASBXHPXeuNqG9BnEAOBJFEubCK0CW0G3AxOpVI2BLBOH6Ju7h/QO8eq J9InxL2zWiW349vOrj9WQDNFx3Tt/D7xT2NUlQcGaTmIrcBZftfP3Gxgerj1FvdQu5IR0kHfl cOkDa4PoaRNJa9U48mi/IRe46chPI/WOqa5mfAaiGgeGJw+UUjDq3Q8dNbh0xKoBchkZ/qCB/ NC+brQQG1l2QjGrHA
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Citing internet drafts
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 06.09.2019 17:43, Heather Flanagan wrote:
> ...
> Yup.
>
> This is one of those areas I’ve bumped into in the past, and promptly
> forgot because it doesn’t make sense to me (but it is the rules, and not
> about me, so…)
>
> We are required to refer to all Internet-Drafts as “work in progress”
> until such time as the IETF provides an update to RFC 2026. RFC 7322 and
> its successors cannot do that update - wrong stream, wrong track. So, my
> guidance in 7322bis is flat out wrong and will have to be rewritten.
> Sandy, Alice, Henrik, and I are discussing a proposal around what will
> work now that allows a proper series name AND supports the requisite
> “work in progress” using the existing v3 vocabulary.

How about just leaving things as they are? Existing code just
special-cases internet drafts, and inserts the text.

If it ain't broke...

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email