Re: [rfc-i] Multi-level bulleted list

Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> Fri, 03 June 2022 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D34EC15AAEF for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654277841; bh=eqDqKKH233M6ghVepKZA84W/q0ck/fAE9mAefRZy4ig=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=vo9e8SefB9RTyP5fxWcznBOib0F2YtRdU4LuWk/anFAbIQL4MXkHv0H0D8dlFXHLB u2g+rsQTTbhmfDcNBV7LTOl1behfixZSpVxwVfmDRBcT66Tg3ESPEhGXiBdeye8zyv CxrI9iizyVe+9MZAt3ndWdA2GB4sqjQ9l1p01Nrk=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Jun 3 10:37:21 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BE5C14F73D; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654277841; bh=eqDqKKH233M6ghVepKZA84W/q0ck/fAE9mAefRZy4ig=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=vo9e8SefB9RTyP5fxWcznBOib0F2YtRdU4LuWk/anFAbIQL4MXkHv0H0D8dlFXHLB u2g+rsQTTbhmfDcNBV7LTOl1behfixZSpVxwVfmDRBcT66Tg3ESPEhGXiBdeye8zyv CxrI9iizyVe+9MZAt3ndWdA2GB4sqjQ9l1p01Nrk=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8797EC14F73D for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.783
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.783 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9r23NxE6vh1R for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6D46C14F6E7 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED1A425A381; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNWBqYNLymXe; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.203] (unknown [47.186.48.51]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E6EA425A37C; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2c6f4997-6044-2483-9f7f-e1dfe3ee1e1d@amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 12:37:15 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <998082E2-051B-418A-B842-BDEE079B731C@gmail.com>
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <998082E2-051B-418A-B842-BDEE079B731C@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/aJdDiRI0V5LwDq5qjpXAdARR1PA>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Multi-level bulleted list
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4129070419229193761=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Krysztof,

To create a nested list like the one below, use the following construction:

<ul>
   <li>
     <t>Let's take a look at...</t>
     <ul>
       <li>The first and second entry...</li>
       <li>The third entry...</li>
     </ul>
   </li>
   <li>Some other stuff I added to this example...</li>
</ul>

which will create the following output:

    *  Let's take a look at...

       -  The first and second entry...

       -  The third entry...

    *  Some other stuff I added to this example...

The key is to use <t/> around the text that is outside the nested list.


More information on nested lists can be found here:

https://authors.ietf.org/en/lists-in-rfcxml


Best regards,

Jean


On 6/3/22 12:08 PM, Krzysztof Szarkowicz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I see some drafts use multi-level bulleted lists. For example 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-18, in 
> Section 5.2:
>
>
>    o  Let's take a look at the flattened pathlist used by the prefix
>       "VPN-IP2", The pathlist associated with the prefix "VPN-IP2" has
>       three entries.
>
>        o The first and second entry have index "0". This is because
>          both entries correspond to ePE2. Thus when hashing performed
>          by the forwarding engine results in using first or the second
>          entry in the pathlist, the forwarding engine will pick the
>          correct VPN label "VPN-L22", which is the label advertised by
>          ePE2 for the prefix "VPN-IP2".
>
>        o The third entry has the index "1". This is because the third
>          entry corresponds to ePE3. Thus when the hashing is performed
>          by the forwarding engine results in using the third entry in
>          the flattened pathlist, the forwarding engine will pick the
>          correct VPN label "VPN-L32", which is the label advertised by
>          "ePE3" for the prefix "VPN-IP2”.
>
>
> I couldn’t figure out, how to create such lists with version 3 XML 
> template.
>
> Do you have some example (for version 3 XML template)?
>
>
> Thank you,
> Krzysztof
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest