Re: [rfc-i] Multi-level bulleted list
Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> Fri, 03 June 2022 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA136C15AAD7 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654277932; bh=Fb3BAf1GOV3tnwyfHVK3OW5AJSL6A9qiijgkVKbPUS8=; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=Hs8OzLsU7RsLizATzJq/x9bVeTrnAs1sjPG5Pzb1wyGHfZ2CTCeiiq/ipcQALoQ/t jPOzLDg9ZMX6edJhCICvg+91kZ2dTH1/9qLkuRU86TZyBboWamMH4dElzYi439u9kf kLYiebeHOp3iZbhFba0dwV4W4GM7HDqCBgnuPrNU=
X-Mailbox-Line: From rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Jun 3 10:38:52 2022
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81CAC14F73D; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1654277932; bh=Fb3BAf1GOV3tnwyfHVK3OW5AJSL6A9qiijgkVKbPUS8=; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=Hs8OzLsU7RsLizATzJq/x9bVeTrnAs1sjPG5Pzb1wyGHfZ2CTCeiiq/ipcQALoQ/t jPOzLDg9ZMX6edJhCICvg+91kZ2dTH1/9qLkuRU86TZyBboWamMH4dElzYi439u9kf kLYiebeHOp3iZbhFba0dwV4W4GM7HDqCBgnuPrNU=
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A83C14F73D for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.784
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.784 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0iPG_dXC4nFY for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08C05C14F6E7 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74A2425A37B; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JUAChW0RrRJO; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.203] (unknown [47.186.48.51]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B417442566EA; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1ca4b692-0721-8d45-2917-cc0f848e44fa@amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 12:38:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language: en-US
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
To: Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
References: <998082E2-051B-418A-B842-BDEE079B731C@gmail.com> <2c6f4997-6044-2483-9f7f-e1dfe3ee1e1d@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <2c6f4997-6044-2483-9f7f-e1dfe3ee1e1d@amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/jIsfZbo472zTaqxT1KgcNyRRkEI>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Multi-level bulleted list
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4916422519108579491=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
Apologies, Krzysztof, for misspelling your name! On 6/3/22 12:37 PM, Jean Mahoney wrote: > > Krysztof, > > To create a nested list like the one below, use the following > construction: > > <ul> > <li> > <t>Let's take a look at...</t> > <ul> > <li>The first and second entry...</li> > <li>The third entry...</li> > </ul> > </li> > <li>Some other stuff I added to this example...</li> > </ul> > > which will create the following output: > > * Let's take a look at... > > - The first and second entry... > > - The third entry... > > * Some other stuff I added to this example... > > The key is to use <t/> around the text that is outside the nested list. > > > More information on nested lists can be found here: > > https://authors.ietf.org/en/lists-in-rfcxml > > > Best regards, > > Jean > > > On 6/3/22 12:08 PM, Krzysztof Szarkowicz wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I see some drafts use multi-level bulleted lists. For example >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-18, in >> Section 5.2: >> >> >> o Let's take a look at the flattened pathlist used by the prefix >> "VPN-IP2", The pathlist associated with the prefix "VPN-IP2" has >> three entries. >> >> o The first and second entry have index "0". This is because >> both entries correspond to ePE2. Thus when hashing performed >> by the forwarding engine results in using first or the second >> entry in the pathlist, the forwarding engine will pick the >> correct VPN label "VPN-L22", which is the label advertised by >> ePE2 for the prefix "VPN-IP2". >> >> o The third entry has the index "1". This is because the third >> entry corresponds to ePE3. Thus when the hashing is performed >> by the forwarding engine results in using the third entry in >> the flattened pathlist, the forwarding engine will pick the >> correct VPN label "VPN-L32", which is the label advertised by >> "ePE3" for the prefix "VPN-IP2”. >> >> >> I couldn’t figure out, how to create such lists with version 3 XML >> template. >> >> Do you have some example (for version 3 XML template)? >> >> >> Thank you, >> Krzysztof >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rfc-interest mailing list >> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org >> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest > > _______________________________________________ > rfc-interest mailing list > rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Multi-level bulleted list Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: [rfc-i] Multi-level bulleted list Jean Mahoney
- Re: [rfc-i] Multi-level bulleted list Jean Mahoney
- Re: [rfc-i] Multi-level bulleted list Krzysztof Szarkowicz